Commonwealth v. Crosley
Decision Date | 28 February 2018 |
Docket Number | No. 2049 EDA 2017,2049 EDA 2017 |
Citation | 180 A.3d 761 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Jermaine Dalton CROSLEY, Appellant |
Court | Pennsylvania Superior Court |
Patrick J. Connors, Public Defender, Media, for appellant.
Steven M. Papi, Media, for appellant.
Katayoun M. Copeland, District Attorney, Media, and Dennis D. Woody, Assistant District Attorney, Media, for Commonwealth, appellee.
BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., PANELLA, J., and STEVENS* , P.J.E.
Appellant, Jermaine Dalton Crosley, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County after the court, sitting as finder of fact in Appellant's bench trial, found him guilty of, inter alia , third degree murder in connection with the fatal shooting of Shawn Mitchell. Sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 120 to 300 months' incarceration with a 14–year probationary tail, and ordered to pay $7,864.72 of restitution to the Pennsylvania Victim's Compensation Fund, Appellant files the present appeal raising challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, the admission of prior bad acts evidence, and the propriety of restitution. We affirm.
The trial court aptly sets forth pertinent facts as follows:
. Ms. Samuels–Mitchell identified Appellant as the man who was living in the shed and who she saw chasing her husband and shooting at him. Id. , at 20–22; N.T. 4/5/17, at 34–35.
I–Shan was also interviewed by Detective Leo Hanshaw in a conference room at the Upper Darby Police Station. N.T., at 35. I–Shan was upset but "handling the situation well." She was not aware of her father's condition. Her statement included the following:
Id. , at 39. She heard her dad tell the man to give him the gun and the "other guy said nothing." In response to a follow-up question regarding whether she saw the man shoot her father, she stated: "all I saw is the guy's hand and the gun, I heard the gun go off about three times, I also saw the bullets that were coming out of the gun." Id. at 41.
. Dr. Albert Chu of the Philadelphia Medical Examiner's Office testified that a bullet went through his left arm and that the presence of soot residue and a muzzle imprint allowed him to conclude that the shot was fired at close range, about an inch from the body. A bullet was recovered from his left flank and that bullet entered the left side of his chest and travelled through his left lung, spleen, pancreas, stomach, superior mesenteric artery and inferior vena cava. N.T. 4/6/17, at 4–24. The entry wound was "atypical" in that it entered the body sideways, leading Doctor Chu to conclude that a single bullet passed through the left arm, entered the Victim's chest and came to rest where it was recovered from the Victim's flank. Id. A second bullet was discovered embedded in the basement wall. N.T. 4/5/17, at 23–29. Both bullets were fired from the 357 magnum Rossi firearm that was hidden at 446 Timberlake Road. Id. , at 125. Fingerprints from the index fingers of Appellant's left and right hands matched fingerprints from the barrel of the gun. Id. , at 128.
Appellant testified at trial [as follows:] On March 12, 2016, he was living in the shed adjoining the basement of 501 Timberlake Road. N.T. 4/6/17, at 39. Appellant acknowledged the fact that he was never allowed in the house alone without Mitchell. Id. , at 43–47. He knew that Mitchell had a gun in the house and testified that Mitchell had threatened him with it on other occasions. Id. , at 48–49.
He testified that on the day of the shooting he volunteered to clean the deck and that Mitchell led him through the kitchen and locked the door behind him making it impossible from him to re-enter the house. Id. , at 57. He was getting cold and couldn't get back inside so he jumped from the deck and entered the house through the basement door. Id. , at 59. He was in the basement when Mitchell appeared from upstairs, angry and cursing and carrying a gun. Id. , at 61. Appellant testified that he thought Mitchell was going to kill him because he had threatened him with the gun before. Id. , at 63. He testified that it was he who pleaded with Mitchell to "take it easy," to "calm down," and "don't do it," when he heard an explosion from four or five feet away. Id. , at 64.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Commonwealth v. Weir, No. 28 WAP 2019
...Commonwealth v. Holmes , 155 A.3d 69 (Pa. Super. 2017), Commonwealth v. Rotola , 173 A.3d 831 (Pa. Super. 2017), and Commonwealth v. Crosley , 180 A.3d 761 (Pa. Super. 2018) ). The Commonwealth asserts that appellate courts generally do not disturb discretionary aspects of sentencing, such ......
-
Commonwealth v. Weir
...authority to enter this award, unlike the Majority, I believe his claim attacks the legality of his sentence.In Commonwealth v. Crosey , 180 A.3d 761 (Pa. Super. 2018), the appellant similarly attacked the lack of evidentiary support for a restitution award. There, the appellant claimed the......
-
Commonwealth v. Gilliam
...that "even the uncorroborated testimony of a single witness may alone be sufficient to convict a defendant." Commonwealth v. Crosley , 180 A.3d 761, 768 (Pa. Super. 2018) (citation omitted). Further, the Commonwealth need not establish "skin to skin" contact to sustain a conviction of indec......
-
Commonwealth v. Sanders
...may sustain its burden of proving every element of the crime by means of wholly circumstantial evidence. Commonwealth v. Crosley , 180 A.3d 761, 767 (Pa. Super. 2018). As an appellate court, we may not re-weigh the evidence and substitute our judgment for that of the fact-finder. Commonweal......