Commonwealth v. Hanley
Decision Date | 02 December 1876 |
Citation | 121 Mass. 377 |
Parties | Commonwealth v. John T. Hanley |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Middlesex.Complaint to the Police Court of the district of Somerville, charging that John T. Hanley, on June 6, 1876, at Somerville, "with force and arms unlawfully did expose and keep for sale intoxicating liquors, with intent unlawfully to sell the same in this Commonwealth; the said John T. Hanley not having then and there any license authority or appointment according to law, then and there to expose, keep for sale or sell said liquors, against the peace of said Commonwealth, and the form of the statute in such case made and provided."
The defendant moved to quash the complaint, "because no offence is specifically or properly charged in the complaint and because the complaint does not follow the words of any statute, and the description of the offence is too vague and uncertain, and there is no allegation of the violation of any provision of law or statute."This motion was overruled and the defendant appealed to the Superior Court.
In the Superior Court, before the jury were empanelled, the defendant renewed the motion made in the court below, and the court overruled the motion.The jury returned a verdict of guilty; and the defendant appealed to this...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Philpots v. State
...is consistent with a right of appeal, as there is no appeal before final judgment, and cites Bennett v. Clemence, 3 Allen, 431; Com. v. Hanley, 121 Mass. 377; Com. v. McCormack, 126 Mass. 258. But the power of final judgment and sentence, given in a particular class of cases which the polic......
- Commonwealth v. Hoar
-
Commonwealth v. Dunleay
... ... is a motion to dismiss for defect in form of process, ... although the point is taken on its brief. It was, indeed, ... once held that an appeal would not lie to this court from an ... order of the superior court, overruling a motion to quash, ... before final judgment. Com. v. Hanley, 121 Mass ... 377. But it is now settled that an appeal will lie from such ... an order, if the defendant is tried and found guilty, and the ... case is ripe for judgment. Com. v. McCormack, 126 ... Mass. 258 ... The ... government next contends that, if the indictment is ... ...