Commonwealth v. Howard
| Decision Date | 28 August 2013 |
| Citation | 74 A.3d 118 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Michael L. HOWARD, Petitioner. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREPetition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 178 EAL 2013.
Prior report: Pa.Super., 64 A.3d 1082.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Application for Extension of Time and Leave to File New Brief (with Request to Proceed Pro Se) are DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Commonwealth v. Brzoska
...evidence, that the evidence was legally obtained. See Commonwealth v. Howard, 64Page 5A.3d 1082, 1087 (Pa. Super. 2013), appeal denied, 74 A.3d 118 (Pa. 2013) (citation omitted). Appellant contends that the traffic stop was illegal because Corporal Dissinger lacked probable cause to conduct......
-
Commonwealth v. Stovall, J-S20033-16
......Howard, 64 A.3d 1082, 1088 (Pa. Super. 2013), appeal denied, 74 A.3d 118 (Pa. 2013) (citations and quotation marks omitted). Furthermore, "[a] finding of reasonable suspicion does not demand a meticulously accurate appraisal of the facts." Commonwealth v. Muhammed, 992 A.2d 897, 901 (Pa. ......