Commonwealth v. Kitchen
| Decision Date | 23 December 2003 |
| Citation | 576 Pa. 229,839 A.2d 184 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Travis L. KITCHEN, Appellant. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Helen A. Stolinas, for Travis Kitchen, appellant.
Stephen G. Downs, Towanda, for the Com. of PA.
Before: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and LAMB, JJ.
Prior report: 814 A.2d 209.
ORDER
The Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
Commonwealth of Pa. v. FOSTER
... ... However, it goes to the legality of appellant's sentence, which cannot be waived."); Commonwealth v. Tustin , 888 A.2d 843 (Pa. Super. 2005) (failure to file a post-sentence motion does not result in waiver of a legality of sentencing claim on appeal); Commonwealth v. Kitchen , 814 A.2d 209 (Pa. Super. 2002) (same), aff'd 839 A.2d 184 (Pa. 2003) (per curiam); Commonwealth v. Dinoia , 801 A.2d 1254, 1257 (Pa. Super. 2002) (improper imposition of an order of restitution may be raised on direct appeal despite a defendant's failure to file a post-sentence motion in the ... ...
-
Com. v. Williams
...about one year; defendant's actions constitutes separate acts); Commonwealth v. Kitchen, 814 A.2d 209 (Pa.Super.2002), affirmed, 576 Pa. 229, 839 A.2d 184 (2003) (holding offenses of creating and possessing child pornography did not merge for sentencing purposes, where defendant photographe......
-
Moreno v. Attorney Gen. of the U.S., 17-1974
...consents to the adult's possession of the images. See Commonwealth v. Kitchen , 814 A.2d 209, 211 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002), aff'd , 576 Pa. 229, 839 A.2d 184 (2003) (adult convicted under § 6312(d) for possessing "sexually explicit photographs of his sixteen-year-old paramour"). And although w......
-
Commonwealth v. Williams, 2005 PA Super 105 (PA 3/18/2005)
...one year; defendant's actions constitutes separate acts); Commonwealth v. Kitchen, 814 A.2d 209 (Pa.Super. 2002), affirmed, 576 Pa. 229, 839 A.2d 184 (2003) (holding offenses of creating and possessing child pornography did not merge for sentencing purposes, where defendant photographed his......
Request a trial to view additional results