Commonwealth v. Ramstedt

Decision Date13 July 1934
Docket Number1-1935
Citation173 A. 772,113 Pa.Super. 548
PartiesCommonwealth v. Ramstedt, Appellant
CourtPennsylvania Superior Court

Argued April 11, 1934

Appeal by defendant from court of Oyer and Terminer and General Jail Delivery of Somerset County, May T., 1933, No. 5, in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. William Ramstedt.

Indictment charging rape and bastardy. Before Boose, P. J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Verdict of guilty upon which judgment of sentence was passed. Defendant appealed.

Error assigned, among others, was the refusal of defendant's motion for new trial.

Affirmed.

Clarence L. Shaver, and with him, Daryle R. Heckman, of Shaver and Heckman, for appellant.

P. G Cober, District Attorney, for appellee.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld Parker and James, JJ.

OPINION

Parker, J.

William Ramstedt, a man seventy years of age at the time of his trial, was convicted of the rape of a girl under sixteen years of age and bastardy, and sentenced by the court below to pay the costs of prosecution, lying-in expenses, and a sum for the maintenance of the child. The sole complaint of the appellant is on account of the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

The Commonwealth produced but one witness, the mother of the child, and depended upon her testimony for a conviction. The defendant took the stand and denied all of the charges. In addition, the defendant produced two physicians who testified that the defendant was sterile at the time of the alleged sexual intercourse. The prosecuting witness placed the time of the intercourse as June 1, 1932, and the birth of the child as March 2, 1933, and stated that she never complained to the defendant about her condition and was never in his company after the first date. On August 22, 1933, more than fourteen months after the date of the alleged intercourse, the defendant submitted to a physical examination by two physicians for the purpose of determining whether he was capable of procreation. The physicians testified that they made an examination of the prostate gland and seminal fluid of the defendant, and that there were then no spermatozoa present and that, in their opinion, there were no live spermatozoa in his seminal fluid on and after June 1, 1932.

Neither the defendant nor his two physicians testified that he was not capable of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Commonwealth v. Jackson
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    • 22 January 1952
    ... ... forcibly and against her will. In Commonwealth v ... Oyler, 130 Pa.Super 405, 407 (1938), that court said: ... " ... The testimony of one witness may be sufficient to sustain a ... conviction of rape: Com. v. Kretezitis, 111 Pa.Super ... 5, 9, 169 A. 417; Com. v. Ramstedt, 113 Pa.Super ... 548, 173 A. 772. However, here the admitted replies of ... defendant to the state policemen and his conduct were ... corroborative of the plaintiff's testimony. It is [only] ... when the testimony of one witness is so indefinite, ... contradictory or unreliable that it would ... ...
  • United States v. Russell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 4 April 1968
    ...is exclusively a question for the jury. Commonwealth v. Turner, 371 Pa. 417, 88 A.2d 915, 32 A.L.R.2d 346 (1952); Commonwealth v. Ramstedt, 113 Pa.Super. 548, 173 A. 772 (1934); Commonwealth v. Katz, 138 Pa.Super. 50, 10 A.2d 49 (1940); Commonwealth v. Carpenter, 172 Pa.Super. 271, 94 A.2d ......
  • Commonwealth v. Allabaugh
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 13 April 1948
    ... ... sufficient to sustain a conviction of sodomy is well ... established by a long line of cases. Commonwealth v ... Ebert, 146 Pa.Super. 362, 22 A.2d 610; Commonwealth ... v. Oyler, 130 Pa.Super. 405, 197 A. 508; ... Commonwealth v. Ramstedt, 113 Pa.Super. 548, 173 A ... 772; Commonwealth v. Kertezitis, 111 Pa.Super. 5, ... 169 A. 417. It is only when the testimony of the one witness, ... in this case the victim, is so indefinite, contradictory, or ... unreliable that it would be unsafe to rest a conviction upon ... it, that ... ...
  • Lewis v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corporation
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 13 July 1934
    ... ... 193, 33 A. 237, ... [173 A. 862] ... the mine foreman is not only in charge of the workings, but ... he represents the Commonwealth. The state insists on his ... employment under the police powers of the state for the ... security and comfort of the miners and invests him with ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT