Commonwealth v. Watley, 845 EDA 2016

Decision Date29 December 2016
Docket NumberNo. 845 EDA 2016,845 EDA 2016
Citation153 A.3d 1034
Parties COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Andre Raymelle WATLEY, Appellant
CourtPennsylvania Superior Court

Matthew J. Deschler, Bethlehem, for appellant.

John M. Morganelli, District Attorney, and Rebecca J. Kulik, Assistant District Attorney, Easton, for Commonwealth, appellee.

BEFORE: BOWES, J., MOULTON, J., and MUSMANNO, J.

OPINION BY MOULTON, J.:

Andre Raymelle Watley appeals from the January 27, 2016 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County dismissing, in part, his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541 –9546.We affirm.

This Court previously summarized the factual background of this matter as follows:

State police effectuated a traffic stop of [Watley] and his passenger, Randy Hayward, after observing them traveling at ninety-five miles per hour in a forty-five mile per hour zone.The stop occurred at approximately 1:45 a.m. on February 14, 2009, on State Route 22 in Northampton County, Pennsylvania.After pulling over the vehicle, Trooper Michael Acevedo and Trooper Lucas Lohrman approached.Trooper Lohrman walked to the passenger's side of the car while Trooper Acevedo went to the driver's side, where [Watley] was seated.When asked why he was traveling at such a high rate of speed [Watley] indicated that he was going to Easton Hospital.However, [Watley] had passed two exits leading to the hospital.[Watley] turned over to police a Pennsylvania identification card with the name "Chonce Acey."Hayward informed police that he was Jermaine Jones, and his birth date was October 4, 1982, but he was unable to provide his social security number.
The troopers ran the information and learned that Jermaine Jones was an alias for Hayward, who had an outstanding warrant for his arrest in New Jersey.Trooper Lohrman removed [Watley] from the car and took the keys to the vehicle before allowing [Watley] to re-enter it.The troopers also asked Hayward to exit the vehicle.When Hayward stepped from the vehicle, police noticed that the floor mat was raised into a high bump and an object appeared to be underneath it.While placing Hayward under arrest, Trooper Acevedo lifted the floor mat and discovered a loaded .22 caliber handgun.Trooper Acevedo promptly alerted his partner, drew his own weapon, and ordered [Watley] to step from the car and show his hands.Rather than comply, [Watley] who was on his cellular phone, fled the scene by running across the road and its median before crossing the opposing lanes of travel and into a wooded area.Trooper Acevedo gave chase for approximately fifteen minutes, but was unable to locate [Watley].
Before police ordered the towing of the vehicle, Hayward requested a jacket that was in the backseat.Police searched the coat for weapons before turning it over to Hayward and discovered two receipts from Western Union containing [Watley's] name.Police also obtained a search warrant for the car and discovered a .25 caliber pistol, a .25 caliber magazine, a box of .22–caliber ammunition, a container with a small amount of marijuana, and thirty-four Ecstasy pills.These items were located in the passenger side glove compartment.
Hayward provided police with a written statement, as follows:
On the date of February 13th I was picked up by "TEF" whose real name is Andre Watley around 6'o[']clock in the evening he was driving a [I]mpala (silver) which he told me was rented for him by a female friend by the name of Erica[.][W]e proceeded to drive thru Allentown while he made his drops and transactions[.][A]round 10 or 11 I got dropped off at Philly's sport[s] bar on Hamilton for a few while he had to go get something.He picked me up around 11:30 or 12 and told me about a party going on in Easton at Larry Holmes Ringside Bar and Grille so we headed out that way about 1:15 or so before we made it to Ringside we were pulled over on 22 East.When the officers initially turned the lights over he stated let's keep going we can outrun them and I stated "no" because we were only speeding and that's when Andre Watley told me there's a slammer under the seat which means "gun" and I said so it's not min [e] and he said it isn't mine either by then the officers were at my window asked for License reg. insurance and ID[.] I didn't have mine and gave them my alias Jermaine Jones which came back as my real name Randy Hayward[.]I was then taken into custody and the gun was found under the seat and Andre took off running.
Commonwealth's Exhibit 6, Hayward Statement.
Prior to [Watley's] trial, Hayward also pled guilty to conspiracy related to the firearms possession and admitted that he was in a vehicle driven by [Watley] that contained two firearms and that he was not licensed to carry such weapons.This information was presented to the jury.When he testified at [Watley's] trial, however, Hayward denied knowing [Watley] or having been with [Watley] on the morning of the stop.In addition, he denied any knowledge of Ecstasy being in the car or that police provided him with his Miranda rights, and he did not remember writing the drops and transactions statement.That statement, which was adopted by Hayward, was introduced as substantive evidence.

Commonwealth v. Watley , 81 A.3d 108, 111–13(Pa.Super.2013)(en banc )(footnote omitted).

Following a jury trial, Watley was convicted of two counts of firearms not to be carried without a license, one count of possession with intent to deliver ("PWID") ecstasy, one count of criminal conspiracy to commit PWID, one count of possession of ecstasy, one count of possession of a small amount of marijuana, one count of false identification to law enforcement,1 and two summary offenses.The court imposed consecutive sentences of 42–84 months on the firearms charges, 60–120 months on the PWID charge,2 4–12 months on the false identification charge, and a consecutive sentence of 15–30 days on the marijuana charge.

Subsequently, as the trial court explained:

[Watley] filed a direct appeal to the Superior Court on May 27, 2011, following the reinstatement of his appellate rights nunc pro tunc .A panel of the Superior Court reversed [Watley's] PWID and conspiracy convictions.The Commonwealth sought reargument, which was granted.Thereafter, [Watley's] sentence was affirmed by the Superior Court.
Commonwealth v. Watley , 81 A.3d 108(Pa. Super.2013).He filed a petition for allowance of appeal to the Supreme Court, which was denied on July 8, 2014.On June 2, 2015, [Watley] filed a timely petition pursuant to the Post–Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S, § 9541 et seq. , which was assigned to the Honorable Paula A. Roscioli as a result of Judge Smith's appointment to the Federal bench in 2014.A hearing on the matter was held on October 9, 2015, and the record left open for additional testimony.The parties then reconvened on October 30, 2015, at which time counsel for [Watley] made an oral discovery motion.That motion was denied in a written opinion by the undersigned on November 12, 2015.

Opinion, 1/27/16, at 1–2("PCRA Op.").

On January 27, 2016, the PCRA court vacated Watley's sentence and ordered re-sentencing to be held on March 11, 2016.3The PCRA court explained that, pursuant to Alleyne v. United States , ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314(2013), andCommonwealth v. Newman , 99 A.3d 86(Pa.Super.2014), Watley's mandatory minimum sentence was unconstitutional.PCRA Op.at 7.The PCRA court further explained that Watley's sentence had to be vacated in its entirety because the entire sentencing scheme was impacted.Id.The PCRA court denied Watley's petition in all other aspects.Watley filed a timely notice of appeal on February 19, 2016.4

Watley raises the following issues on appeal:

A.Attorney Sletvold was ineffective for failing to object (or failing to appeal, if the trial record is construed as the Trial Court ruling that such statements were admissible) to the admission of the prior statement and prior guilty plea colloquy of Randy Hayward, given that such prior statements were not inconsistent with Haywards trial testimony.
B.Attorney Sletvold was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress evidence found during an unconstitutional search and seizure of the vehicle stopped by the state police.
C.Attorney Sletvold was ineffective for failing to consult with [Watley] prior to trial, failing to call alibi witnesses, and failing to advise [Watley] that it was in his interest to testify at trial.
D.The PCRA Court erred in failing to grant [Watley]'s request that the identification card of Chonce Acey be sent to the Pennsylvania State Police for fingerprint analysis.

Watley's Br.at 4–5(suggested answers omitted).

Our standard of review from the denial of post-conviction relief "is limited to examining whether the PCRA court's determination is supported by the evidence of record and whether it is free of legal error."Commonwealth v. Ousley , 21 A.3d 1238, 1242(Pa.Super.2011).This Court"will not disturb findings that are supported by the record."Id.

I.INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL

We first address Watley's claims for ineffective assistance of counsel.When analyzing ineffectiveness claims, we begin with the presumption that counsel was effective.Commonwealth v. Spotz , 610 Pa. 17, 18 A.3d 244, 259–60(2011)."[T]he defendant bears the burden of proving ineffectiveness."Commonwealth v. Ligons , 601 Pa. 103, 971 A.2d 1125, 1137(2009).To overcome the presumption of effectiveness, a PCRApetitioner must demonstrate that: "(1) the underlying substantive claim has arguable merit; (2)counsel whose effectiveness is being challenged did not have a reasonable basis for his or her actions or failure to act; and (3)the petitioner suffered prejudice as a result of counsel's deficient performance."Id."A claim of ineffectiveness will be denied if the petitioner's evidence fails to meet any of these...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
48 cases
  • Commonwealth v. Grove
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 31 de agosto de 2017
    ...Id. at 24–25. They distinguished Bryant as "applying only to capital petitioners." Id. at 24.13 Most recently, in Commonwealth v. Watley, 153 A.3d 1034 (Pa. Super. 2016), appeal denied, ––– Pa. ––––, 169 A.3d 574, 2017 WL 2538785 (2017), a panel of this Court cited the lead opinion in Gaine......
  • Commonwealth v. Padilla
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 29 de dezembro de 2021
    ...v. Cooper , 994 A.2d 589, 592 (Pa.Super. 2010), appeal denied , 608 Pa. 660, 13 A.3d 474 (2010). See also Commonwealth v. Watley , 153 A.3d 1034, 1045 (Pa.Super. 2016) (explaining that it was not relevant to reasonable suspicion inquiry that "neither of the troopers testified that they fear......
  • Commonwealth v. Jackson
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 29 de junho de 2021
    ...evidence had been suppressed, there is a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable." Commonwealth v. Watley, 153 A.3d 1034, 1044 (Pa. Super. 2014).A review of appellant's amended petition indicates that he failed to provide sufficient legal or factual support fo......
  • Commonwealth v. Grove, J-A15046-17
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 31 de agosto de 2017
    ...Id. at 24-25. They distinguished Bryant as "applying only to capital petitioners." Id. at 24.13 Most recently, in Commonwealth v. Watley, 153 A.3d 1034 (Pa. Super. 2016), appeal denied, No. 69 MAL 2017, 2017 WL 2538785 (Pa., June 12, 2017), a panel of this Court cited the lead opinion in Ga......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT