Complete Auto Transit, Inc v. Brady

Citation430 U.S. 274,51 L.Ed.2d 326,97 S.Ct. 1076
Decision Date07 March 1977
Docket NumberNo. 76-29,76-29
PartiesCOMPLETE AUTO TRANSIT, INC., Appellant, v. Charles R. BRADY, Jr., etc
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

See 430 U.S. 976, 97 S.Ct. 1669.

Syllabus

A Mississippi tax on the privilege of doing business in the State held not to violate the Commerce Clause when it is applied to an interstate activity (here the transportation by motor carrier in Mississippi to Mississippi dealers of cars manufactured outside the State) with a substantial nexus with the taxing State, is fairly apportioned, does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and is fairly related to the services provided by the State. Spector Motor Service v. O'Connor, 340 U.S. 602, 71 S.Ct. 508, 95 L.Ed. 573, overruled. Pp. 279-289.

330 So.2d 268, Miss., affirmed.

Alan W. Perry, Jackson, Miss., for appellant.

James H. Haddock, Jackson, Miss., for appellee.

Mr. Justice BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court.

Once again we are presented with "the perennial problem of the validity of a state tax for the privilege of carrying on within a state, certain activities' related to a corporation's operation of an interstate business.' Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle, 421 U.S. 100, 101, 95 S.Ct. 1538, 1539, 44 L.Ed.2d 1 (1975), quoting Memphis Gas Co. v. Stone, 335 U.S. 80, 85, 68 S.Ct. 1475, 1477, 92 L.Ed. 1832 (1948). The issue in this case is whether Mississippi runs afoul of the Commerce Clause, U.S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 3, when it applies the tax it imposes on 'the privilege of . . . doing business' within the State to appellant's activity in interstate commerce. The Supreme Court of Mississippi unanimously sustained the tax against appellant's constitutional challenge. 330 So.2d 268 (1976). We noted probable jurisdiction in order to consider anew the applicable principles in this troublesome area. 429 U.S. 813, 97 S.Ct. 52, 50 L.Ed.2d 72 (1976).

I

The taxes in question are sales taxes assessed by the Mississippi State Tax Commission against the appellant, Complete Auto Transit, Inc., for the period from August 1, 1968, through July 31, 1972. The assessments were made pursuant to the following Mississippi statutes:

'There is hereby levied and assessed and shall be collected, privilege taxes for the privilege of engaging or continuing in business or doing business within this state to be determined by the application of rates against gross proceeds of sales or gross income or values, as the case may be, as provided in the following sections.' Miss.Code Ann., 1942, § 10105 (1972 Supp.), as amended.1

'Upon every person operating a pipeline, railroad, airplane, bus, truck, or any other transportation business for the transportation of persons or property for compensation or hire between points within this State, there is hereby levied, assessed, and shall be collected, a tax equal to five per cent of the gross income of such business . . ..' § 10109(2), as amended.2

Any person liable for the tax is required to add it to the gross sales price and, 'insofar as practicable,' to collect it at the time the sales price is collected. § 10117, as amended.3

Appellant is a Michigan corporation engaged in the business of transporting motor vehicles by motor carrier for General Motors Corporation. General Motors assembles outside Mississippi vehicles that are destined for dealers within the State. The vehicles are then shipped by rail to Jackson, Miss., where, usually within 48 hours, they are loaded onto appellant's trucks and transported by appellant to the Mississippi dealers. App. 47-48, 78-79, 86-87. Appellant is paid on a contract basis for the transportation from the railhead to the dealers.4 Id., 50-51, 68.

By letter dated October 5, 1971, the Mississippi Tax Com- mission informed appellant that it was being assessed taxes and interest totaling $122,160.59 for the sales of transportation services during the three-year period from August 1, 1968, through July 31, 1971.5 Remittance within 10 days was requested. Id., at 9-10. By similar letter dated December 28, 1972, the Commission advised appellant of an assessment of $42,990.89 for the period from August 1, 1971, through July 31, 1972. Id., at 11-12. Appellant paid the assessments under protest and, in April 1973, pursuant to § 10121.1, as amended, of the 1942 Code (now § 27-65-47 of the 1972 Code), instituted the present refund action in the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County.

Appellant claimed that its transportation was but one part of an interstate movement, and that the taxes assessed and paid were unconstitutional as applied to operations in interstate commerce. App. 4, 6-7. The Chancery Court, in an unreported opinion, sustained the assessments. Id., at 99-102.

The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed. It concluded:

'It will be noted that Taxpayer has a large operation in this State. It is dependent upon the State for police protection and other State services the same as other citizens. It should pay its fair share of taxes so long, but only so long, as the tax does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and there is no danger of interstate commerce being smothered by cumulative taxes of several states. There is no possibility of any other state duplicating the tax involved in this case.' 330 So.2d, at 272.

Appellant, in its complaint in Chancery Court, did not allege that its activity which Mississippi taxes does not have a sufficient nexus with the State; or that the tax discriminates against interstate commerce; or that the tax is unfairly apportioned; or that it is unrelated to services provided by the State.6 No such claims were made before the Mississippi Supreme Court, and although appellant argues here that a tax on 'the privilege of engaging in interstate commerce' creates an unacceptable risk of discrimination and undue burdens, Brief for Appellant 20-27, it does not claim that discrimination or undue burdens exist in fact.

Appellant's attack is based solely on decisions of this Court holding that a tax on the 'privilege' of engaging in an activity in the State may not be applied to an activity that is part of interstate commerce. See, e. g., Spector Motor Service v. O'Connor, 340 U.S. 602, 71 S.Ct. 508, 95 L.Ed. 573 (1951); Freeman v. Hewit, 329 U.S. 249, 67 S.Ct. 274, 91 L.Ed. 265 (1946). This rule looks only to the fact that the incidence of the tax is the 'privilege of doing business'; it deems irrelevant any consideration of the practical effect of the tax. The rule reflects an underlying philosophy that interstate commerce should enjoy a sort of 'free trade' immunity from state taxation.7

Appellee, in its turn, relies on decisions of this Court stating that '(i)t was not the purpose of the commerce clause to relieve those engaged in interstate commerce from their just share of state tax burden even though it increases the cost of doing the business,' Western Live Stock v. Bureau of Revenue, 303 U.S. 250, 254, 58 S.Ct. 546, 548, 82 L.Ed. 823 (1938). These decisions8 have considered not the formal language of the tax statute but rather its practical effect, and have sustained a tax against Commerce Clause challenge when the tax is applied to an activity with a substantial nexus with the taxing State, is fairly apportioned, does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and is fairly related to the services provided by the State.

Over the years, the Court has applied this practical analysis in approving many types of tax that avoided running afoul of the prohibition against taxing the 'privilege of doing business,' but in each instance it has refused to overrule the prohibition. Under the present state of the law, the Spector rule, as it has come to be known, has no relationship to economic realities. Rather it stands only as a trap for the unwary draftsman.

II

The modern origin of the Spector rule may be found in Freeman v. Hewit, supra. 9 At issue in Freeman was the ap- plication of an Indiana tax upon 'the receipt of the entire gross income' of residents and domiciliaries. 329 U.S., at 250, 67 S.Ct., at 275. Indiana sought to impose this tax on income generated when a trustee of an Indiana estate instructed his local stockbroker to sell certain securities. The broker arranged with correspondents in New York to sell the securities on the New York Stock Exchange. The securities were sold, and the New York brokers, after deducting expenses and commission, transmitted the proceeds to the Indiana broker who in turn delivered them, less his commission, to the trustee. The Indiana Supreme Court sustained the tax, but this Court reversed.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, speaking for five Members of the Court, announced a blanket prohibition against any state taxation imposed directly on an interstate transaction. He explicitly deemed unnecessary to the decision of the case any showing of discrimination against interstate commerce or error in apportionment of the tax. Id., at 254, 256-257, 67 S.Ct., at 277, 278-79. He recognized that a State could constitutionally tax local manufacture, impose license taxes on corporations doing business in the State, tax property within the State, and tax the privilege of residence in the State and measure the privilege by net income, including that derived from interstate commerce. Id., at 255, 67 S.Ct., at 278. Nevertheless, a direct tax on interstate sales, even if fairly apportioned and nondiscriminatory, was held to be unconstitutional per se.

Mr. Justice Rutledge, in a lengthy concurring opinion, argued that the tax should be judged by its economic effects rather than by its formal phrasing. After reviewing the Court's prior decisions, he concluded: 'The fact is that 'direct incidence' of a state tax or regulation . . . has long since been discarded as being in itself sufficient to outlaw state legislation.' Id., at 265-266, 67 S.Ct., at 283-284. In his view, a state tax is unconsti- tutional...

To continue reading

Request your trial
926 cases
  • Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • June 30, 1986
    ...was unconstitutional. Despite the rather unique nature of the instant case, the same analysis should apply. In Complete Auto Transit, supra, 430 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. 1076, the court adopted a four-part test for determining whether a state tax imposed on interstate commerce will survive a comm......
  • Etc Mktg., Ltd. v. Harris Cnty. Appraisal Dist.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Texas
    • April 28, 2017
    ...stream of interstate commerce, and even if it was, the tax was valid under all four prongs of the Supreme Court's holding in Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady , which supplies the test for determining the constitutionality of state taxation of interstate commerce. 430 U.S. 274, 279, 97 ......
  • In re Franchise Tax Bd. Ltd. Liab. Corp. Tax Refund Cases
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • July 18, 2018
    ...(Commerce Clause) because it was not " ‘fairly apportioned’ " under the test set forth in Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady (1977) 430 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. 1076, 51 L.Ed.2d 326, given that an LLC incurred the levy based on its total worldwide income merely by registering with the state, ev......
  • MAYO COLLABOR. SERVICES v. COM'R OF REVENUE, No. A04-2190.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Minnesota (US)
    • June 30, 2005
    ...(3) not discriminate against interstate commerce, and (4) "fairly relate[] to the services provided by the State." 430 U.S. 274, 279, 97 S.Ct. 1076, 51 L.Ed.2d 326 (1977). To show that a tax violates the clause, a taxpayer must show that the tax does not satisfy at least one of these prongs......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
44 firm's commentaries
  • State + Local Tax Insights: Winter 2014
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • January 21, 2014
    ...apportioned, was invalid on the basis that a state could not tax a federal privilege—interstate commerce). 20 358 U.S. 450, 457 (1959). 21 430 U.S. 274 22 Complete Auto Transit, 430 U.S. at 288. 23 See, e.g., Freeman v. Hewitt, 329 U.S. 249, 253 (noting that attempts to tax interstate comme......
  • U.S. Supreme Court Holds Lack Of County Personal Income Tax Credit For Taxes Paid To Other States Violates Commerce Clause
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • May 28, 2015
    ...SALT Alert: Maryland Court of Appeals Rules Denial of County-Level Tax Credit for Taxes Paid to Other States Violates Commerce Clause. 8 430 U.S. 274 9 U.S. CONST. art. I, § 8, cl. 3. 10 Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Jefferson Lines, Inc., 514 U.S. 175, 179 (1995). 11 Citing Fulton Corp. v. Faulkn......
  • Sales And Use of Taxation of Internet Transactions
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • April 20, 2004
    ...commerce if four prong test is met. The most recent evolution of the commerce clause is found in Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 97 S. Ct. 1076 (1977). In that case, the Supreme Court specifically overruled Spector Motor Service, and held that all states have the right to lay a tax on......
  • Nexus, The Threshold Requirement For State Taxation Of Multi-State Businesses
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • April 16, 2004
    ...commerce if four prong test is met. The most recent evolution of the commerce clause is found in Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 97 S. Ct. 1076 (1977). In that case, the Supreme Court specifically overruled Spector Motor Service, and held that all states have the right to lay a tax on......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
44 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Suplemmentary Materials
    • January 1, 2007
    ...(5th Cir. 2006), 1478 Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington, 79 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 1996), 1285 Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. 1076, 51 L.Ed.2d 326 (1977), Connally v. General Constr. Co., 269 U.S. 385, 46 S.Ct. 126, 70 L.Ed. 322 (1926), 1298 Connecticut v.......
  • Domicile, Residence and Citizenship
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 82, December 2008
    • Invalid date
    ...Board, 463, U.S. 159, 164 (1983); Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Comm'n., 458 U.S. 307, 315 (1982); Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274, 279 (1977); and Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mealey, 334 U.S. 653, 660 (1948). 101B. Supra, Zelinsky, note 101, 1 N.y. 3d 85, at 90. 10......
  • The Ideology of Supreme Court Opinions and Citations
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 97-3, March 2012
    • March 1, 2012
    ...Corp., 429 U.S. 252 (1977) United Jewish Orgs. of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Carey, 430 U.S. 144 (1977) Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 (1977) Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977) Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978) First Nat’l Bank of Bos. v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978......
  • The Ideology of Supreme Court Opinions and Citations
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 97-3, March 2012
    • March 1, 2012
    ...Corp., 429 U.S. 252 (1977) United Jewish Orgs. of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Carey, 430 U.S. 144 (1977) Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 (1977) Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977) Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978) First Nat’l Bank of Bos. v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT