Compton, In re, 83-1053

Decision Date08 August 1983
Docket NumberNo. 83-1053,83-1053
PartiesIn re Dorth Halon Bunyard COMPTON, Debtor. Dorth Halon Bunyard COMPTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otho Dwight COMPTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. Summary Calendar.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

William Lewis Sessions, John M. Tutt, San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Marita Montgomery Emmett, Evelyn H. Biery, San Antonio, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

John Compere, San Antonio, Tex., for other interested party for minor child.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Before GEE, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Acting under its "related case" jurisdiction, 28 United States Code Section 1471(b), the bankruptcy court assumed removal jurisdiction of this divorce case in which one of the parties had taken voluntary bankruptcy, entering orders concerning child custody, child support and so on. Pursuant to 28 United States Code Section 1334(b), the district court entertained an appeal of the bankruptcy court's action in taking jurisdiction and remanded the divorce case to state court, concluding that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over the marital status of the debtor. The debtor appeals the remand order.

Whether the remand order be viewed as one of abstention or as one grounded in a perceived want of jurisdiction, we are not empowered to review it. 28 United States Code Sections 1471(d) and 1478. The appeal is

DISMISSED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Browning v. Navarro
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 1, 1984
    ...121, 146 (1982). The statute plainly prohibits our review of a bankruptcy court's remand order on direct appeal. In re Compton, 711 F.2d 626 (5th Cir.1983); see also Shell Pipe Line Corp. v. West Texas Marketing Corp., 540 F.Supp. 1155 (S.D.Tex.1982) (bankruptcy court's decision to remand u......
  • Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc., 95-21023
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 18, 1996
    ...appeal where district court remanded bankruptcy-related case on grounds of lack of federal jurisdiction and abstention); In re Compton, 711 F.2d 626, 627 (5th Cir.1983) (holding that this court is not empowered to review district court's order remanding bankruptcy-related case on grounds of......
  • In re Biglari Import & Export, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Western District of Texas
    • June 17, 1992
    ...v. Texas Air Corp., 834 F.2d 488 (5th Cir.1987). See also In re Rayburn Enterprises, Inc., 781 F.2d 501 (5th Cir.1986); In re Compton, 711 F.2d 626 (5th Cir.1983). 12 Of course, the notion of "related to" jurisdiction is sufficiently broad that it might well sweep up even a case which also ......
  • In re Bissonnet Investments LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • February 4, 2003
    ...In re Rayburn Enters., 781 F.2d 501, 502 (5th Cir. 1986); Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069, 1076 n. 21 (5th Cir.1984); In re Compton, 711 F.2d 626, 627 (5th Cir.1983). These cases implicitly analyze the interplay of the two restrictions on appellate review of remand decisions, 28 U.S.C. §......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT