Compton v. Perkins
Decision Date | 31 July 1933 |
Citation | 144 Or. 346,24 P.2d 670 |
Parties | COMPTON v. PERKINS et al. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Sept. 12, 1933.
En Banc.Appeal from Circuit Court, Douglas County; J. W. Hamilton, Judge.
Suit by Ray B. Compton, as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of the Roseburg Oil & Gas Company, bankrupt, against J. W. Perkins Carrie B. Perkins, and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants named appeal.
Affirmed.
This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court, entered in a suit brought by the plaintiff, as trustee of the estate of the Roseburg Oil & Gas Company, a bankrupt, to enforce the liability of its stockholders for payments of the par value of their stock. The appellants are J. W. Perkins, and his wife, Carrie B. Perkins, who are the transferees of J. C Edsall, a subscriber for 40,000 shares of stock. The decree of the circuit court was in favor of the plaintiff.
Dexter Rice, of Roseburg (Rice & Orcutt, of Roseburg, on the brief) for appellants.
Carl E Wimberly and M. L. Hallmark, both of Roseburg (Ralph A. Coan, of Portland, on the brief), for respondent.
A narrative of the facts will enable us to state in a better manner our disposition of the assignments of error. The complaint names as defendants twenty-four individuals, but since only two of them, J. W. Perkins and Carrie B. Perkins, have appealed, we shall, for convenience, refer to them as the defendants.
The resolution directed that the instrument accepting the leases should provide that the corporation should discharge all of the covenants of the leases, "and further agrees *** (3) to pay on or before the last day of each month one-sixteenth part or share to Julian W. Perkins, the assignor herein, and one-sixteenth part or share to John C. Edsall, of Roseburg, Oregon, of all oil and gas produced and saved from said premises during the preceding month by delivering the said oil and gas into pipe lines for their credit at the prevailing prices for said oil or gas at that time, and ***"
The resolution also recited:
After Perkins had assigned the leases to the corporation, the latter undertook the drilling of a well, but after reaching a depth of 200 feet abandoned the undertaking without having discovered oil or gas. Still later, after the corporation had been adjudged a bankrupt, claims filed against it to the extent of $8,802.49 received the approval of the referee in bankruptcy. The total receipts of the trustee in bankruptcy amount to $1,146.63.
The uncontradicted testimony shows that no oil or gas in commercial quantities has been discovered in this state. The plaintiff testified that, although not a geologist, "I am well acquainted with everything done in regard to oil in Douglas County," and that he has "had as much to do with them (oil leases) as anyone in this territory." Based upon his experience, his examination of this land, and "statements made to me by men who have more experience than I, and also upon reports of experts of the highest standing," he believed that the leases, on July 25, 1923, were without value. The report to which he referred was received in evidence without objection and is before us. It is entitled "Geologic Atlas" and consists of a report upon a geological survey of the land surrounding Roseburg, made by a geologist in the employ of the Department of the Interior, whose qualifications the defendants concede. W. F. Kernin, a resident of Roseburg, who had obtained oil leases in Douglas county, testified that oil leases in the year 1923 possessed no market value. Sam Foster, a witness for the defendants, testified that he had had twenty years' experience in the procuring, purchase and sale of oil leases almost entirely in other states. He testified that "there is a great deal of difference" between the value of an oil lease upon ground in a proven field and upon ground in an unproven field, but that a lease upon land in an unproven field was worth $2 an acre, and that, if a competent geologist reported the discovery of an oil structure in such a field, the leases would be worth $10 an acre. Although he was unfamiliar with Edsall's report, and had never seen these lands, he expressed the opinion that the leases were worth $10 an acre. C. A. Lillisburg, a real estate broker, who was a witness for the defendants, testified that some oil leases upon a 30-acre tract in the vicinity of what is known as Leeper Dome had sold for $8 an acre, and leases upon another tract...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sierra Club v. Andrus
...in existence and functioning. Sellers v. Frohmiller, 42 Ariz. 239, 24 P.2d 666, 669 (1933) (emphasis added). The court continued at 24 P.2d 670: If an act which makes appropriations to the various departments of the state contains, In addition to appropriations, legislation of such a nature......
-
Plummer v. Donald M. Drake Co.
...employers on the construction work referred to and suffered an accidental injury in connection with his employment. See Compton v. Perkins, 144 Or. 346, 357, 24 P.2d 670; 71 C.J.S. Pleading § 590 c. p. 1173. We think that the supplemental answer states facts sufficient to raise the issue of......
-
Saunders v. A.M. Williams & Co.
... ... adversary's witnesses in the trial of the cause in the ... court below." See, also, Compton v. Perkins, ... 144 Or. 346, 24 P.2d 670 ... Under ... all of the circumstances of this case we conclude that the ... ...
-
Baker Production Credit Ass'n v. Long Creek Meat Co., Inc.
...is filed after a demurrer to the complaint has been overruled. Igo v. Butler, 199 Or. 423, 428, 262 P.2d 675 (1953); Compton v. Perkins, 144 Or. 346, 357, 24 P.2d 670 (1933); Lauderback v. Multnomah County, 111 Or. 681, 687--688, 226 P. 697 (1924). Taken together, the pleadings adequately a......