Concepcion v. Soto, No. 75-1155
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before HASTIE, GIBBONS and HUNTER; HASTIE |
| Citation | 519 F.2d 405 |
| Parties | Benito CONCEPCION, Appellant, v. Menelio Cruz SOTO and Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority. |
| Docket Number | No. 75-1155 |
| Decision Date | 07 July 1975 |
Page 405
v.
Menelio Cruz SOTO and Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority.
Third Circuit.
Decided July 7, 1975.
Leroy A. Mercer, Christiansted, St. Croix, V. I., for appellant.
Verne A. Hodge, Atty. Gen. of the Virgin Islands, Emory W. Reisinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, V. I., for appellee.
Before HASTIE, GIBBONS and HUNTER, Circuit Judges.
Page 406
OPINION OF THE COURT
HASTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment that denied the petition of a judgment creditor for an order "commanding the . . . (Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority) to make payment of" a $20,000 money judgment, plus costs and an attorney's fee, entered against the Authority in a tort action for personal injury and property damage. Failure of the Authority to respond to the original complaint had resulted in imposition of liability by default. Thereafter, damages had been determined by a jury.
The Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority is an incorporated instrumentality of the Government of the Virgin Islands. In the Act of August 13, 1964, No. 1248, Sess.L.1964, 30 V.I.C. (1974 Supp.) § 103, the Legislature of the Virgin Islands created this corporate instrumentality, defined its functions and powers, authorized it to issue bonds and created and limited its amenability to judicial process. While the enumerated powers of the Authority included the capacity "to sue and be sued", 30 V.I.C. § 105(4), its amenability to judicial process was restricted by the following provision:
"All property including funds of the Authority shall be exempt from levy and sale by virtue of an execution, and no execution or other judicial process shall issue against the same nor shall any judgment against the Authority be a charge or lien upon its property; Provided, however, That this subsection shall not apply to or limit the right of bondholders to pursue any remedies for the enforcement of any pledge or lien given by the Authority on its rates, fees, revenues, or other income or any other funds." 30 V.I.C. (1974 Supp.) § 111(a).
We think that the relief sought here, a judicial order that would compel the Authority to surrender its assets in payment of a money judgment for tortious personal injury, is within the meaning of the quoted prohibitory language, since the order sought would be "judicial process" designed to reach the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Turbe v. Government of Virgin Islands, No. 90-3843
...Sec. 111(a) (1975). We have interpreted Sec. 111(a) as permitting WAPA to refuse to pay judgments entered against it. Concepcion v. Soto, 519 F.2d 405 (3d Cir.1975). But this provision does not grant full immunity to WAPA. Thus, a plaintiff may be able to satisfy a judgment against WAPA by ......
-
Durant v. Husband, No. 93-7414
...is nevertheless a "judgment by default" prohibited in actions brought under the Virgin Islands Tort Claims Act. See Concepcion v. Soto, 519 F.2d 405, 407 n. 2 (3d We emphasize that our holding applies to the situation where the government has failed to appear or file an answer in response t......
-
Durant v. Husband, No. 93-7414
...is nevertheless a "judgment by default" prohibited in actions brought under the Virgin Islands Tort Claims Act. See Concepcion v. Soto, 519 F.2d 405, 407 n.2 (3d Cir. 1975). We emphasize that our holding applies to the situation where the government has failed to appear or file an answer in......
-
Lindway v. Gov't of the Virgin Islands, Civil No. 80/10
..."the district court may issue a mandatory order." Moreover, we think that the Third Circuit opinion of Concepcion v. Cruz Soto, 519 F.2d 405 (3rd Cir. 1975) is controlling. In Concepcion, the plaintiff was trying to enforce a tort judgment it obtained against the Virgin Islands Water and Po......
-
Turbe v. Government of Virgin Islands, No. 90-3843
...Sec. 111(a) (1975). We have interpreted Sec. 111(a) as permitting WAPA to refuse to pay judgments entered against it. Concepcion v. Soto, 519 F.2d 405 (3d Cir.1975). But this provision does not grant full immunity to WAPA. Thus, a plaintiff may be able to satisfy a judgment against WAPA by ......
-
Durant v. Husband, No. 93-7414
...is nevertheless a "judgment by default" prohibited in actions brought under the Virgin Islands Tort Claims Act. See Concepcion v. Soto, 519 F.2d 405, 407 n. 2 (3d We emphasize that our holding applies to the situation where the government has failed to appear or file an answer in response t......
-
Durant v. Husband, No. 93-7414
...is nevertheless a "judgment by default" prohibited in actions brought under the Virgin Islands Tort Claims Act. See Concepcion v. Soto, 519 F.2d 405, 407 n.2 (3d Cir. 1975). We emphasize that our holding applies to the situation where the government has failed to appear or file an answer in......
-
Lindway v. Gov't of the Virgin Islands, Civil No. 80/10
..."the district court may issue a mandatory order." Moreover, we think that the Third Circuit opinion of Concepcion v. Cruz Soto, 519 F.2d 405 (3rd Cir. 1975) is controlling. In Concepcion, the plaintiff was trying to enforce a tort judgment it obtained against the Virgin Islands Water and Po......