Concerned Democrats of Florida v. Reno
| Decision Date | 31 August 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-1652,79-1652 |
| Citation | 601 F.2d 891 |
| Parties | CONCERNED DEMOCRATS OF FLORIDA, and Edward Cohen, President of Concerned Democrats of Florida, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Janet RENO, State Attorney of Dade County, Florida, and Jim Smith, Attorney General of Florida, Defendants-Appellees. Summary Calendar. * |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Steven Wisotsky, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for Hon. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Before CLARK, GEE and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellants prevailed below in a civil rights suit in which they persuaded the district court to interfere by injunction with a portion of the Florida judicial selection plan forbidding partisan political organizations from endorsing judicial candidates. They sought an award of attorneys' fees for this advancement of the public interest at their private instance, but were rebuffed by a denial stating merely that such an award "would be inappropriate in this case."
42 U.S.C. Section 1988 places the award of such fees within the trial court's discretion but it is settled law in this circuit that this means more than it appears to say and that such prevailing parties as plaintiff should ordinarily recover attorneys' fees unless special circumstances would render an award of them unjust. See Morrow v. Dillard, 580 F.2d 1284, 1300 (5th Cir. 1978). We cannot determine from this record or from the court's brief reference to inappropriateness why fees were denied. We therefore vacate the court's order of denial and remand for an appropriate award of fees or for a finding on and statement of the special circumstances which render such an award unjust. See Criterion Club v. Board of Comm'rs, 594 F.2d 118 (5th Cir. 1979).
VACATED AND REMANDED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wells v. Hutchinson
...606 F.2d 635 (5th Cir. 1979); Iranian Students Association v. Edwards, 604 F.2d 352 (5th Cir. 1979); Concerned Democrats of Florida v. Reno, 601 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1979). There are no such special circumstances in this civil action; indeed, the facts affirmatively indicate that it would gro......
-
Kirchberg v. Feenstra
...court on remand make record findings on those special circumstances that justify denial of an award. Concerned Democrats of Florida v. Reno, 601 F.2d 891, 892 (5th Cir.1979), remanded, Concerned Democrats of Florida v. Reno, 493 F.Supp. 660 (S.D.Fla.1980); reversed on other grounds, Concern......
-
McCulloch v. Glasgow
...both defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust. Concerned Democrats of Florida v. Reno, 601 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1979); Morrow v. Dillard, 580 F.2d 1284 (5th Cir. 1978). Any award should include fees for services rendered on this appeal a......
-
Romain v. Walters, 16-30929
...on remand make record findings on those special circumstances that justify denial of an award." (citing Concerned Democrats of Fla. v. Reno , 601 F.2d 891, 892 (5th Cir. 1979) )). The district court has discretion (subject to review on appeal) to determine how this evidence will be presente......