Conley v. Gibson, No. 15566.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation229 F.2d 436
PartiesJ. D. CONLEY, Stanley Moore, Sr., George L. Carter, and B. A. Watson, Appellants, v. Pat J. GIBSON, General Chairman of Locals 6051 and 28 et al., Appellees.
Decision Date15 March 1956
Docket NumberNo. 15566.

229 F.2d 436 (1956)

J. D. CONLEY, Stanley Moore, Sr., George L. Carter, and B. A. Watson, Appellants,
v.
Pat J. GIBSON, General Chairman of Locals 6051 and 28 et al., Appellees.

No. 15566.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

January 31, 1956.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1956.


Roberson L. King, Houston, Tex., Dent, Ford, King & Wickliff, Houston, Tex., for appellants.

Edward J. Hickey, Jr., Washington, D. C., Chester M. Fulton, L. G. Clinton, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., Mulholland, Robie & Hickey, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RIVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Slocomb v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 339 U.S. 239, 70 S.Ct. 577, 94 L.Ed. 795; Hettenbaugh v. Airline Pilots Ass'n, 5 Cir., 189 F.2d 319.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • Richardson v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., No. 16142.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • June 11, 1957
    ...Committee v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 320 U.S. 323, 64 S.Ct. 146, 88 L.Ed. 76, and this Circuit's decision in Conley v. Gibson, 229 F.2d 436, affirming 138 F.Supp. 60, certiorari granted, 352 U.S. 818, 819, 77 S.Ct. 37, 1 L.Ed. 44, and Hampton v. Thompson, 5 Cir., 171 F.2d 535. Appella......
  • Conley v. Gibson 6051 28, No. 7
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • November 18, 1957
    ...jurisdiction over Page 44 the controversy. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, apparently relying on the same ground, affirmed. 229 F.2d 436. Since the case raised an important question concerning the protection of employee rights under the Railway Labor Act we granted certiorari. 3......
  • Richardson v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., Civ. A. No. 9240.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Southern District of Texas
    • March 28, 1956
    ...the court was without jurisdiction, affirmed by Per Curiam Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Conley v. Gibson, 229 F.2d 436. And finally, quoting Judge Hutcheson in the case of Hampton v. Thompson, 5 Cir., 1948, 171 F.2d 535, "What and all that is for decision he......
3 cases
  • Richardson v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., No. 16142.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • June 11, 1957
    ...Committee v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 320 U.S. 323, 64 S.Ct. 146, 88 L.Ed. 76, and this Circuit's decision in Conley v. Gibson, 229 F.2d 436, affirming 138 F.Supp. 60, certiorari granted, 352 U.S. 818, 819, 77 S.Ct. 37, 1 L.Ed. 44, and Hampton v. Thompson, 5 Cir., 171 F.2d 535. Appella......
  • Conley v. Gibson 6051 28, No. 7
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • November 18, 1957
    ...jurisdiction over Page 44 the controversy. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, apparently relying on the same ground, affirmed. 229 F.2d 436. Since the case raised an important question concerning the protection of employee rights under the Railway Labor Act we granted certiorari. 3......
  • Richardson v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., Civ. A. No. 9240.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Southern District of Texas
    • March 28, 1956
    ...the court was without jurisdiction, affirmed by Per Curiam Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Conley v. Gibson, 229 F.2d 436. And finally, quoting Judge Hutcheson in the case of Hampton v. Thompson, 5 Cir., 1948, 171 F.2d 535, "What and all that is for decision he......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT