Connelly v. Balkwill, 13981.
| Decision Date | 14 April 1960 |
| Docket Number | No. 13981.,13981. |
| Citation | 279 F.2d 685 |
| Parties | Lawrence E. CONNELLY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George W. BALKWILL et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Harold K. Bell, and Robert E. Williamson, Lakewood, Ohio, for appellants.
Everett D. McCurdy and Lincoln Reavis of Spieth, Bell & McCurdy, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief.
Charles D. Johnson, of Baker, Hoststler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.
William B. Brooks, in pro. per., Chicago, Ill., E. S. Cummings, Jr. of Cummings & Wyman, Chicago, Ill., on the brief.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and CECIL and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge McNamee granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment, reported in Connelly v. Balkwill, 174 F.Supp. 49.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Co.
... ... Peat Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 363 F.Supp. 1212, 1217-18 (D.Mich.1973); Connelly v. Balkwill, 174 F.Supp. 49, 63-64 (N.D.Ohio 1959), Aff'd per curiam, 279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960); ... ...
-
Nash County Bd. of Educ. v. Biltmore Co.
... ... Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Co., 186 F.2d at 467; Connelly v. Balkwill, 174 F.Supp. 49, 60 (N.D.Ohio 1959), aff'd., 6 Cir., 279 F.2d 685 (1960); 10 Kaufman ... ...
-
Morris v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.
...Corp., 533 F.2d at 344; See Nickels v. Koehler Management Corp., 541 F.2d at 614. Dating back to its decision in Connelly v. Balkwell, 279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960), that Circuit has consistently favored applying the period of limitations for common law fraud as opposed to the period governi......
-
Carothers v. Rice
...1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074, 97 S.Ct. 813, 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977), followed in Gaudin, supra. An earlier case, Connelly v. Balkwill, 279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960), had applied without discussion Ohio's four year statute of limitations for fraud actions to a federal securities claim rat......