Conners Marine Co. v. Manhattan Lighterage Co., 457.
| Decision Date | 06 July 1937 |
| Docket Number | No. 457.,457. |
| Citation | 91 F.2d 1011 |
| Parties | CONNERS MARINE CO., Appellant, v. MANHATTAN LIGHTERAGE CO., Appellee. AMERICAN MOLASSES CO., Appellee, v. THE SEATRAIN HAVANA, Seatrain Lines, Inc., Appellee, Conners Marine Co., Inc., Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Thomas A. McDonald, of New York City, for appellant.
Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper and John L. Galey, all of New York City, for Manhattan Lighterage Co.
Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann and Edwin Sere Murphy, all of New York City, for the Seatrain Havana and Seatrain Lines, Inc.
Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, of New York City, for American Molasses Co.
Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
Decree (16 F.Supp. 22), affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
THE STEEL INVENTOR
...Co. v. Hedger, 290 U.S. 82, 87, 54 S.Ct. 10, 78 L.Ed. 189; and The Irving, D.C., 16 F. Supp. 22, affirmed, Conners Marine Co. v. Manhattan Lighterage Co., 2 Cir., 91 F.2d 1011, are cases quite similar on the facts. The distinction between a demise charter and a contract of affreightment wou......
-
Luria Bros. & Co., Inc. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.
...& Gravel Corp. v. Tidewater Const. Corp., 4 Cir., 170 F.2d 392, 394; The Irving, D.C., 16 F.Supp. 22, aff'd, Conners Marine Co. v. Manhattan Lighterage Co., 2 Cir., 91 F.2d 1011.) However, despite the duty to explain the loss, each party still has the burden to prove its claim by a fair pre......
-
Richmond Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Tidewater Const. Corp.
...initial proof that the article was delivered in good condition. The Irving, 16 F.Supp. 22, 26, affirmed Conners Marine Co. v. Manhatten Lighterage Co., 2 Cir., 91 F.2d 1011. That is precisely what occurred in this case. After hearing all the evidence, the Trial Judge concluded that the caps......
-
THE CW CRANE
...time of delivery on charter has been held to be insufficient (e. g. The Irving, D.C., 16 F.Supp. 22, affirmed Conners Marine Co. v. Manhattan Lighterage Co., 2 Cir., 91 F.2d 1011, The Sundial, 2 Cir., 43 F.2d 700, The Cullen No. 32, 2 Cir., 62 F.2d 68, affirmed 290 U.S. 82, 54 S.Ct. 10, 78 ......
Request a trial to view additional results