Connolly v. Connolly
| Decision Date | 03 June 1987 |
| Citation | 508 N.E.2d 103,400 Mass. 1002 |
| Parties | Dorothy L. CONNOLLY v. Owen F. CONNOLLY. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Bernard Glazier, Springfield, for plaintiff.
Michael D. Parker (Michael J. O'Connor, III, Springfield, with him), for defendant.
Before HENNESSEY, C.J., and WILKINS, ABRAMS, NOLAN and LYNCH, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
In January, 1985, the marriage of Owen and Dorothy Connolly was dissolved by the entry of a judgment of divorce nisi. The judgment was accompanied by an award of alimony to the wife and a property division. The wife appealed the judgment to the Appeals Court, which summarily remanded the case to the Probate Court to reconsider the settlement. Connolly v. Connolly, 22 Mass.App.Ct. 1110, 495 N.E.2d 334 (1986). We granted the defendant's application for further appellate review.
The gravamen of the wife's appeal is that the financial settlement is inequitable because the judge's factual findings are inaccurate. The wife claims, for example, that the judge miscalculated the husband's annual income, over assessed the value of their house, distorted the contributions of each spouse to the marriage, and was misinformed about the source of money in her savings account. The wife's arguments must be rejected because she has not satisfied her evidentiary burden and, as such, these claims are nothing more than mere allegations.
The judge, as required, held a hearing at which both parties presented evidence pertaining to the potential alimony award and property division. The judge's reported findings tracked the criteria set forth in G.L. c. 208, § 34 (1984 ed.). In the absence of a transcript, as here, we assume that those findings are adequately supported. Doten v. Doten, 395 Mass. 135, 141, 479 N.E.2d 132 (1985). We shall not reverse a judge's factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Fox Tree v. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc., 398 Mass. 845, 847, 501 N.E.2d 519 (1986). In order to review factual findings, we must have a record of all the evidence which was before the judge. The wife here has the burden of producing that evidence either by providing a transcript of that hearing, Mass.R.A.P. 8(b), as appearing in 378 Mass. 932 (1979), or a statement of the evidence pursuant to Mass.R.A.P. 8(c), as appearing in 378 Mass. 932 (1979). She has not complied with either of these rules. Therefore we are unable to assess whether the judge's findings of fact are clearly...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Baccanti v. Morton
...partnership. See note 6, supra. 8. We will not reverse the judge's decision unless clearly erroneous. See, e.g., Connolly v. Connolly, 400 Mass. 1002, 1003 (1987), citing Fox Tree v. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc., 398 Mass. 845, 847 (1986). See also Mass. R. Dom. Rel. P. 52 (a) 9. Of cou......
-
Downey v. Downey, 00-P-138.
...the modification hearing, he is not in a position to challenge the judge's factual findings on the point. See Connolly v. Connolly, 400 Mass. 1002, 1003, 508 N.E.2d 103 (1987). We note also that there is nothing in the judge's findings to indicate that the wife's needs were excessive or unr......
-
In re Valerie R. Pecce Supplemental Needs Trust
...under these circumstances. See Mass. R. A. P. 8 (b) (1), as appearing in 481 Mass. 1611 (2019). See also Connolly v. Connolly, 400 Mass. 1002, 1003, 508 N.E.2d 103 (1987) ("In order to review factual findings, we must have a record of all the evidence which was before the judge. The [appell......
-
M.M. v. D.A.
...court with complete transcripts, is not in a position to argue that the judge's finding is unsupported. See Connolly v. Connolly, 400 Mass. 1002, 1003, 508 N.E.2d 103 (1987). It is also clear that the judge envisioned that the return of the child might be made more complex by the Costa Rica......