O'Connor v. Town of Waterbury
Citation | 69 Conn. 206,37 A. 499 |
Parties | O'CONNOR v. TOWN OF WATERBURY. |
Decision Date | 25 May 1897 |
Court | Supreme Court of Connecticut |
Case reserved from district court, New Haven county; Albert P. Bradstreet, Judge.
Action by John O'Connor against the town of Waterbury. Case reserved on demurrer to the complaint Demurrer sustained.
The amended complaint is as follows:
The defendant demurs to the complaint for the following reasons:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial17 cases
-
Hitchcock v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.
...212; and a demurrer might deprive the plaintiff of an opportunity to plead matters in avoidance of the statute; O'Connor v. Waterbury, 69 Conn. 206, 210, 37 A. 499; but, when a demurrer raising the issue of the Statute of Limitations is filed and the plaintiff joins in that issue, it can pr......
-
Capers v. Lee
...& Co., 144 Conn. 170, 171-72, 127 A.2d 814 (1956); Radezky v. Sargent & Co., 77 Conn. 110, 114, 58 A. 709 (1904); O'Connor v. Waterbury, 69 Conn. 206, 210, 37 A. 499 (1897). Instead, they filed a motion to dismiss. "A motion to dismiss properly attacks the jurisdiction of the court, essenti......
-
Sean O'Kane AIA Architect, P.C. v. Puljic
... ... limitation claim by filing in avoidance. O'Conner v ... Waterbury, 69 Conn. 206, 210, 37 A. 499 (1897). The ... plaintiff's Matter in Avoidance is silent on ... ...
-
Davis v. Mills
... ... supporting this contention in O'Connor v ... Waterbury, 69 Conn. 206, 37 A. 499. But in a later cause ... in the same state it was held that, where there ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results