Connors v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.
| Decision Date | 12 November 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 319,Docket 71-1593.,319 |
| Citation | 450 F.2d 1119 |
| Parties | Richard X. CONNORS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Paul D. Scanlon, Alexandria, Va., for plaintiffs-appellants.
John E. F. Wood, New York City (Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.
Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, New York City, on the brief, for defendant-appellee Bristol-Myers Co.
Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, on the brief, for defendant-appellee American Cyanamid Co.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, on the brief, for defendants-appellees Squibb Beech-Nut, Inc. and Olin Corporation.
Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C., on the brief, for defendant-appellee The Upjohn Co.
Before MEDINA, FEINBERG and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.
We affirm on Judge Lord's opinion below, reported at 333 F.Supp. 296 (S.D. N.Y.1971).
United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Alpine Pharmacy, Inc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.
- Dosier v. Miami Valley Broadcasting Corp.
-
Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n, s. 1177
...(S.D.N.Y.) (Rule 23(b)(3) class suit with class members objecting to prior settlement), aff'd per curiam sub nom. Connors v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., 450 F.2d 1119 (2d Cir. 1971). See generally Developments in the Law Class Actions, 89 Harv.L.Rev. 1318, 1402-16 (1976); Comment, The Importance of......
- NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. Sherwood, 26596.