Conservation Com'n of Fairfield v. Red 11
Decision Date | 16 February 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 30212.,30212. |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF FAIRFIELD v. RED 11, LLC. |
J. Christopher Rooney, with whom was Anne D. Peterson, New Haven, for the appellant (defendant).
Noel R. Newman, Fairfield, for the appellee (named plaintiff).
Edward V. O'Hanlan, with whom, on the brief, was Thomas J. Donlon, Stamford, for the appellee (intervening plaintiff Wilmington Trust Company).
DiPENTIMA, GRUENDEL and LAVERY, Js.
In Red 11, LLC v. Conservation Commission, 117 Conn.App. 630, 980 A.2d 917, cert. denied, 294 Conn. 918, 984 A.2d 68 (2009), this court answered the question of whether a conservation commission properly had issued a cease and desist order prohibiting a property owner from conducting certain activities in wetlands. We concluded that the owner's activities did not fall within the farming exception to wetlands regulation and therefore required a permit. We now face the question of whether the court properly issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the property owner from engaging in those activities and ordering injunctive relief. The defendant property owner, Red 11, LLC appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the conservation commission of the town of Fairfield (commission). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court improperly issued the injunctive relief because the commission lacked jurisdiction over the property, (2) the doctrine of municipal estoppel precluded the commission from ordering restoration of the property and (3) the court abused its discretion by issuing the permanent injunction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We previously set forth the following facts. "On May 11, 2001, Salvatore K. DiNardo obtained an eighteen acre parcel of land located at 1159 Redding Road in Fairfield. DiNardo then conveyed title to the [defendant], a limited liability company of which DiNardo is the managing member and principal. The property contains three distinct wetlands and watercourse areas: the Redding Road area, the vernal pool and the Rider's Lane area. In September, 2001, Edward Jones, a wetlands compliance officer, issued a cease and desist order advising DiNardo to stop activities on the property that were impacting wetlands and watercourses.
" Red 11, LLC v. Conservation Commission, supra, 117 Conn.App. at 633-37, 980 A.2d 917.
During the events described previously, the commission filed a verified complaint on August 5, 2004, seeking a temporary and permanent injunction prohibiting and restraining the defendant from undertaking any further construction activities at 1159 Redding Road and from any further violations of the General Statutes and Fairfield regulations. Soon thereafter, Wilmington successfully moved to intervene as a plaintiff. On August 15, 2006, the commission and Wilmington filed a four count amended complaint. The first count, filed by the commission alone, alleged that the defendant continually had violated the cease and desist...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Conservation Com.m'n of the Town of Fairfield v. Red 11, LLC.
...from undertaking further construction activities and engaging in further violations of regulations. Conservation Commission v. Red 11, LLC, 119 Conn.App. 377, 383, 987 A.2d 398, cert. denied, 295 Conn. 924, 991 A.2d 566 (2010). Twenty-one days later, on August 26, 2004, Wilmington filed a “......
-
Harley v. The Indian Spring Land Co..
...claims. It is axiomatic that the credibility of witnesses is the sole province of the trial court. See Conservation Commission v. Red 11, LLC, 119 Conn.App. 377, 391, 987 A.2d 398, cert. denied, 295 Conn. 924, 991 A.2d 566 (2010). 18 As noted previously, the plaintiff next sent Rockefeller ......
-
Conservation Comm'n of the Town v. Red 11, LLC
...from undertaking further construction activities and engaging in further violations of regulations. Conservation Commission v. Red 11, LLC, 119 Conn. App. 377, 383, 987 A.2d 398, cert. denied, 295 Conn. 924, 991 A.2d 566 (2010). Twenty-one days later, on August 26, 2004, Wilmington filed a ......
-
Li v. Yaggi, AC 40683
...facts for her claim of equitable estoppel), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 901, 931 A.2d 263 (2007) ; see also Conservation Commission v. Red 11, LLC , 119 Conn. App. 377, 388, 987 A.2d 398 (record inadequate to review defendant's claim of municipal estoppel), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 924, 991 A.2d......