Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy

Decision Date15 March 1972
Citation288 A.2d 872,118 N.J.Super. 521
PartiesCONTI CAUSEWAY FORD, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Norma JAROSSY and Stephen Jarossy, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TOMS RIVER, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Denis J. Corbett, Staff Atty., Ocean County Legal Services, Inc., Toms River, for appellants Norma Jarossy and Stephen Jarossy.

Robert S. Fisher, Teaneck, for respondent The First National Bank of Toms River.

Eugene Jume, Lakewood, filed statement in lieu of brief for respondent Conti Causeway Ford.

Before Judges LEWIS, HALPERN and LORA.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the issues raised by appellants in the light of the circumstances of this case, and conclude the judgment should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in Judge Robert H. Doherty, Jr.'s opinion below.

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • In re Schwalb, BK S 05 17766 LBR.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Nevada
    • 3 Agosto 2006
    ...predecessor to Section 9-625); Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy, 114 N.J.Super. 382, 276 A.2d 402 (Dist.Ct.1971), aff'd 118 N.J.Super. 521, 288 A.2d 872 (Ct.App.Div. 1972) (failure of notice justified penalty against seller under predecessor of Section Thus, the statutory minimum penalty of N......
  • Randolph v. Franklin Inv. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • 29 Enero 1979
    ...credited to the debtor's account." Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy, 114 N.J.Super. 382, 276 A.2d 402, 404-05 (1971), aff'd, 118 N.J. Super. 521, 288 A.2d 872 (1972).12 We this approach. The trial court's judgment granting Franklin a $750 deficiency judgment accordingly must be reversed.13 II......
  • Dependable Ins. Co., Inc. v. Landers
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 Septiembre 1982
    ...291, 496 P.2d 1016 (1972); Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy, 114 N.J.Super. 382, 276 A.2d 402 (Ocean County Ct.1971), aff'd, 118 N.J.Super. 521, 288 A.2d 872 (1972). Failure to give notice in this case would be a "shield" and not a "sword" as regards Dependable. If available as a defense, it ......
  • Sunjet, Inc. v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 10 Diciembre 1985
    ...95, 560 P.2d 917 (1977); Conti Causeway Ford v. Jarossy, 114 N.J.Super. 382, 276 A.2d 402 (N.J.Dist.Ct.1971), aff'd, 118 N.J.Super. 521, 288 A.2d 872 (N.J.Super.A.D.1972), and Franklin State Bank v. Parker, 136 N.J.Super. 476, 346 A.2d 632 (N.J.Dist.Ct.1975); Clark Leasing Corporation v. Wh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT