Continental Casualty Co. v. The Valspar Corp.
| Docket Number | 15-1547,15-1623 |
| Decision Date | 09 February 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Allianz Global Risks US Ins. Co. v. ACE Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.
...claim by a co-insurer that has paid claims for or to its insured for the same covered obligations. In Continental Cas. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 812 F.3d 1147, 1150 (8th Cir. 2016), the insurer against whom contribution was being sought argued that it was not liable for contribution ......
-
Meyer, Borgman & Johnson, Inc. v. Comm'r
...interpretation and the propriety of summary judgment are legal issues we review de novo." Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 812 F.3d 1147, 1149 (8th Cir. 2016). This court reviews de novo the Tax Court's legal conclusions; findings of fact are upheld unless clearly......
-
Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am.
...the consecutive insurers based on the number of days each insurer's policy covered. Id. at 793. The Eighth Circuit applied the Continental Casualty Co. findings in allocating a Missouri tort action settlement where consecutive insurers provided coverage to the insured during the time period......
-
Alticor Glob. Holdings v. Am. Int'l Specialty Lines Ins. Co.
...since it found that an insurer providing a "fronting" policy was contractually bound to pay for defense costs in the first instance. Id. at 1150-51. In reaching this conclusion, the Eighth Circuit found that the bottom-line impact of the policy's "fronting" structure "immaterial," focusing ......