Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Werner

Decision Date03 February 1923
CitationContinental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Werner, 36 Idaho 601, 215 P. 458 (Idaho 1923)
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
PartiesCONTINENTAL & COMMERCIAL TRUST & SAVINGS BANK, Appellant, v. WILHELMINA WERNER, GOODING COUNTY, IDAHO, et al., Respondents

APPEAL-DISMISSAL-JURISDICTION.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, for Gooding County. Hon. H. F. Ensign, Judge.

Action to foreclose lien. Appeal dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Walters Parry & Bailey, Paul S. Haddock and E. D. Reynolds, for Appellant.

M. F Ryan and A. F. James, for Respondent, Gooding County.

Counsel cite no authorities on point decided.

BUDGE C. J. McCarthy and Dunn, JJ., concur.

OPINION

BUDGE C. J.

This action was brought by Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank against Wilhelmina Werner, her husband, and Gooding county, Idaho, to foreclose a lien upon certain real property for the unpaid principal, interest and assessments due for water right. Default was entered against Wilhelmina Werner and no service was made upon her husband. Respondent, Gooding county, answered, claiming its lien for taxes on said premises to be prior to the lien of appellant. The cause was tried to the court upon a stipulation of facts and judgment was entered in favor of appellant and against respondent, Wilhelmina Werner, ordering foreclosure and sale of the premises. The court adjudged and decreed the lien of respondent, Gooding county, to be a prior lien to that of appellant. Judgment was entered and filed on June 20, 1921. Notice of appeal from the judgment was not filed until September 20, 1921, more than 90 days after the entry of the judgment and after the statutory time for filing the same had expired.

C. S., sec. 7152, provides as follows:

"An appeal may be taken to the supreme court from a district court:

"1. From a final judgment in an action . . . . within 90 days after the entry of such judgment . . . . "

In the case of Goade v. Gossett, 35 Idaho 84, 204 P. 670, it is held: "Appeal from judgment taken after expiration of statutory time will be dismissed."

See, also, to the same effect: Glenn v. Aultman & Taylor M. Co., 30 Idaho 719, 167 P. 1163; Mills v. Board of County Commrs., 35 Idaho 47, 204 P. 876; Chapman v. Boehm, 27 Idaho 150, 147 P. 289; Moe v. Harger, 10 Idaho 194, 77 P. 645.

In the case last cited it is said: "This is a jurisdictional question and the court has no power to extend the time or cure the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • Scottish American Mortg. Co., Ltd. v. Minidoka County
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1928
    ...of taxes priority over senior incumbrances, if at all, only upon the property itself upon which the tax was levied. The rule announced in the Werner case above cited, that so far the property assessed is itself concerned, the tax levied is superior to even a pre-existing incumbrance thereon......
  • North Side Canal Co., Ltd., a Corp. v. Idaho Farm Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • October 26, 1939
    ... ... assessment. ( Federal Land Bank v. Bissonnette, 51 ... Idaho 219, 4 P.2d 364; ... court. ( Continental & Commercial Trust & Sav. Bank v ... Werner, ... Savings Bank, a corporation, and to Twin Falls North Side ... ...
  • Bosworth v. Anderson
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1929
    ... ... J. S. ANDERSON et al., PACIFIC STATES SAVINGS AND LOAN COMPANY, EQUITABLE SAVINGS AND LOAN ... case of Commercial Nat. Bank v. City of Portland, 24 ... Ore. 188, ... Maries, 44 Idaho 700, 260 P. 155; Continental & ... Commercial Trust & Sav. Bank v. Werner, ... ...
  • Mountain States Implement Co. v. Arave
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • May 4, 1931
    ... ... 27 Idaho 150, 147 P. 289; Continental & Commercial Trust ... & Sav. Bank v. Werner, 36 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free