Continental Ore Company v. Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Citation | Continental Ore Company v. Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation, 368 U.S. 886, 82 S.Ct. 141, 7 L.Ed.2d 87 (1961) |
| Decision Date | 23 October 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. 304,304 |
| Parties | CONTINENTAL ORE COMPANY et al., petitioners, v. UNION CARBIDE AND CARBON CORPORATION et al |
Joseph L. Alioto and Maxwell Keith, for petitioners.
Herbert W. Clark, Richard J. Archer and Girvan Peck, for respondents Union Carbide Corp. and United States Vanadium Corp.
Edward R. Neaher and Francis N. Marshall, for respondent Vanadium Corp. of America.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Questions 2, 5, and 6 presented by the petition which read as follows:
'2. Whether an Appellate Court can take away from a jury the question of causal effect concerning an injury by a 100% two-company monopoly (admittedly achieved pursuant to an intent to monopolize) when the question of violation is confessed and the issue of measurement of damages is more than sufficiently supported by relevant economic data and where the destruction of the plaintiff company (petitioners herein) was admitted to be, by a chief executive officer of a defendant, an important goal of the monopolists?
'5. Whether petitioners, an American company, can claim damages under the anti-trust laws for injury caused by their elimination from the Canadian market when it was shown that two other American companies had entered into a conspiracy to eliminate all competition and to monopolize the industry and when it is shown that as part of this conspiracy one of the American companies utilized its domination and control over a wholly owned Canadian subsidiary, which had been given a discretionary power by the Canadian government to allocate the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Performed Line Products Co. v. Fanner Mfg. Co., 15117
... ... PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, ... The FANNER ... Line Products Company, an Ohio corporation. At the time suit was begun, the plaintiff was ... the electrical purpose, thereby effecting a union of the highest efficiency in these ... Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 U.S ... ...
-
Blohm & Voss AG v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc.
... ... by plaintiff Blohm & Voss AG, a German company having its principal place of business and ... (Grace) 2 is a corporation of Delaware having its principal place of ... l ippines, Republic of Korea, Thailand, Union of Be rma, and Formosa" on a non-exclusive ... ...
-
Vaughan v. Atkinson, 92-6075
... ... were required to bring suit against a labor union to prevent discrimination. Rolax v. Atlantic ... 's orders and commands any of the ship's company be in the service of the ship, and thereby happen ... ...
-
U.S. v. McPartlin
... ... board of the Louisiana-based Ingram Corporation, had paid defendant Robert F. McPartlin, an ... Bull, president of a towing company, were alleged to be intermediaries through whom ... him to go to the bar at the Continental Plaza Hotel to meet defendant Janicki, which ... ...