Continetal & Savings Bank v. Fuel & Home Fuel
Decision Date | 15 April 1919 |
Docket Number | 16089 |
Citation | 99 Ohio St. 453,126 N.E. 508 |
Parties | The Continetal & Savings Bank Co. v. The Home Fuel & Supply Co. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Judgments - Proceedings to vacate - Motion for new trial - Proceedings in error - Final order.
Mr. A. S. Holbrook and Mr. C. A. Banker, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Warren J. Duffey and Mr. George C. Bryce, for defendant in error.
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be and the same is hereby affirmed. The motion to vacate the judgment rendered in the common pleas on a cognovit note upon warrant of attorney and without summons or notice was filed the day following the rendition of the judgment and during the same term. The lower courts, therefore, were right in considering it as a motion for a new trial, filed within the time prescribed by law. The action Of the trial court sustaining such motion does not constitute a final order from which a proceeding in error may be prosecuted. Judgment affirmed. JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON, DONAHUE, WANAMAKER and ROBINSON, JJ., concur. NICHOLS, C. J., not participating.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Hamm v. Hamm
-
In re Holmes' Estate
... ... v. Baxter State Bank, 308 U.S. 371, 60 S.Ct. 317, 84 L.Ed. 329; Miller ... See German Savings & Loan Soc. v. Dormitzer, 192 U.S. 125, 24 S.Ct ... ...
- Hamm v. Hamm
-
Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel
... ... had actually lived for years in their Paris home and the decree was granted after an actual court ... ...