Contractors Association of Philadelphia and Eastern Pennsylvania v. National Labor Relations Board

Decision Date31 October 1961
Docket NumberNo. 13725.,13725.
Citation295 F.2d 526
PartiesCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA AND EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania Corporation of the First Class, the General Building Contractors Association and the Pennsylvania Excavators Association, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Manus McHugh, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioners.

No appearance for respondent.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioners complain because the general counsel for the National Labor Relations Board has refused to institute proceedings for unfair labor practices against certain local unions. The allegation is that petitioners are entitled, under the Constitution of the United States, to judicial review of the general counsel's action since, say petitioners, that action deprives them of some property right which they hold under the common law of Pennsylvania. There is, obviously, no final order of the Board for us to review. And except in a limited number of circumstances our jurisdiction is limited to final orders. National Labor Relations Act § 10(f), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(f). The very point raised by appellant, that is, the authority of a Court of Appeals to review a refusal by general counsel to act in a particular matter was before this Court in Insurance Workers International Union, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. N. L. R. B., No. 13,088, and the petition for review was dismissed on January 19, 1960. Certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 1961, 363 U.S. 806, 80 S.Ct. 1238, 4 L.Ed.2d 1147. A similar situation was presented to this Court in Janek v. N. L. R. B., No. 13,738, and petition for review was likewise dismissed for want of jurisdiction on September 8, 1961.

The petition in this case will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Rockford Redi-Mix Co., Inc. v. Zipp
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 12 Septiembre 1980
    ...held it to be so. See, e. g., National Maritime Union v. NLRB, 423 F.2d 625, 626 (2d Cir. 1970) (per curiam); Contractors Ass'n v. NLRB, 295 F.2d 526 (3d Cir. 1961) (per curiam), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 813, 82 S.Ct. 689, 7 L.Ed.2d 612 (1962); Wellington Mill Div., West Point Mfg. Co. v. NLR......
  • NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF POSTAL & FEDERAL EMP. v. Klassen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • 22 Enero 1974
    ...v. N.L.R.B., 330 F.2d 579, 590 (4th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 882, 85 S. Ct. 144, 13 L.Ed.2d 88; Contractor's Ass'n of Phila. et al. v. N.L.R.B., 295 F. 2d 526 (3rd Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 813, 82 S.Ct. 689, 7 L.Ed.2d VI. CONCLUSION The Court has concluded that the Posta......
  • Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., Baltimore Metropolitan Chapter v. Irving
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 18 Diciembre 1979
    ...v. Ordman, 366 F.2d 776 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. den., 385 U.S. 1026, 87 S.Ct. 753, 17 L.Ed.2d 674 (1966); Contractors Assoc. of Phil. & Eastern Pa. v. NLRB, 295 F.2d 526 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. den., 369 U.S. 813, 82 S.Ct. 689, 7 L.Ed.2d 612 (1962); Hourihan v. NLRB, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316, 201 F.......
  • Henderson v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE. & WU LOC. 50
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 26 Abril 1972
    ...306, 307 (1st Cir. 1948); United Elec. Contractors' Ass'n v. Ordman, 366 F.2d 776 (2d Cir. 1966); Contractors' Ass'n of Philadelphia & Eastern Pennsylvania v. NLRB, 295 F.2d 526 (3d Cir. 1961); Wellington Mill Div., West Point Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 579, 591 (4th Cir. 1964); NLRB v. Bar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT