Cook County v. Industrial Commission

Decision Date02 April 1973
Docket NumberNo. 45141,45141
Citation295 N.E.2d 465,54 Ill. 2d 79
PartiesThe COUNTY OF COOK, Appellant, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al. (Henry Leslie, Appellee.)
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

Edward V. Hanrahan, State's Atty., Chicago (Vincent Bentivenga, Jr., and Donald P. Smith, Asst. State's Attys., of counsel), for appellant.

Kane, Doy & Harrington, Chicago (Steven H. Shanok, Chicago, of counsel), for appellee.

UNDERWOOD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the County of Cook from a judgment of the circuit court of Cook County affirming a decision of the Industrial Commission.That decision confirmed the arbitrator's finding that the claimant, Henry Leslie, contracted pulmonary tuberculosis as a result of his employment at Cook County Hospital, thus entitling him to compensation under the Workmen's Occupational Diseases Act.

The facts are undisputed.The claimant was employed as a pathologist's assistant in the autopsy room of Cook County Hospital for about 15 years prior to January 15, 1968, and was also employed during the same period as a laboratory technician and pathologist's assistant at the Chicago State Tuberculosis Sanitarium.He worked approximately 40 hours per week at each institution performing various duties which will be discussed later in this opinion.Every 90 days he was required to submit to routine chest X rays to determine the possible existence of tuberculosis.X rays taken in September, 1967, proved negative.However, X rays taken in January, 1968, revealed the possible existence of tuberculosis, which was later confirmed, leading to surgery for the removal of a portion of his left lung.

In his position as a pathologist's assistant at Cook County Hospital, the claimant prepared cadavers for diagnosis by opening the cadavers and sometimes removing organs.He testified that between September, 1967, and January, 1968, he prepared about 360 cadavers, of which approximately 35 were contagious due to the presence of tuberculosis.The normal attire for persons performing autopsies at Cook County Hospital included white trousers, a white gown and rubber gloves.No face mask was worn unless a case had been prediagnosed as contagious.The claimant testified, however, that tuberculosis was sometimes not diagnosed by the pathologist until the organs were exposed during the autopsy.In such instances, he would then put on a face mask to guard against contraction of the disease.

The Director of the Department of Pathology at Cook County Hospital, Dr. Paul Szento, testified from his notes that during the 5-month period in question there were 6 reported autopsies in which tuberculosis was diagnosed as the cause of death.However, he had no records as to the number of cadavers on which autopsies were performed in which tuberculosis was present although not the primary cause of death.He corroborated the claimant's testimony that persons in the autopsy room not wearing protective face masks were exposed to tubercular cadavers in cases in which the cause of death was not known and the presence of tuberculosis was not discovered until after removal of the organs.He further testified that the reason for wearing face masks after the discovery of the existence of tuberculosis was to protect against the inhalation of infections tubercle bacilli which escaped from the exposed tubercular organs and polluted the air.

At the Chicago State Tuberculosis Sanitarium, the claimant spent approximately two thirds of his time as a lab technician doing routine blood examinations in the biochemistry lab.The balance of his time there was spent in assisting with autopsies as a pathologist's assistant.He testified that from September, 1967, through January, 1968, he prepared no more than 3 tubercular cadavers, and that in accordance with the standard procedures for autopsies at the...

To continue reading

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
5 cases
  • Booker v. Duke Medical Center
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 12, 1979
    ...absence of the disease prior to the work-related exposure as shown by the employee's medical history. See County of Cook v. Industrial Commission, 54 Ill.2d 79, 295 N.E.2d 465 (1973); Evans v. Indiana University Medical Center, 121 Ind.App. 679, 100 N.E.2d 828 (1951); Peterson v. State, 234......
  • Sperling v. Industrial Com'n
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1989
    ...required direct proof that the claimant has in fact been exposed to a disease while employed (see County of Cook v. Industrial Comm'n (1973), 54 Ill.2d 79, 295 N.E.2d 465; Lewis v. Industrial Comm'n (1967), 38 Ill.2d 461, 231 N.E.2d 593; Byrd v. Industrial Comm'n (1965), 33 Ill.2d 115, 210 ......
  • Moss Equipment v. Industrial Commission
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • October 1, 1973
    ...in the testimony, draw inferences therefrom and determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies. (County of Cook v. Industrial Com. (1973), 54 Ill.2d 79, 295 N.E.2d 465; Pheoll Mfg. Co. v. Industrial Com. (1973), 54 Ill.2d 119, 295 N.E.2d 469; Crepps v. Industrial Com. (1949), 402 Il......
  • Sperling v. Industrial Com'n
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 25, 1988
    ...required direct proof that the claimant has in fact been exposed to a disease while employed, (see County of Cook v. Industrial Comm'n (1973), 54 Ill.2d 79, 295 N.E.2d 465; Lewis v. Industrial Comm'n (1967), 38 Ill.2d 461, 231 N.E.2d 593; Byrd v. Industrial Comm'n (1965), 33 Ill.2d 115, 210......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT