Cook v. State, 75725

Decision Date30 May 1991
Docket NumberNo. 75725,75725
Citation581 So.2d 141
Parties16 Fla. L. Weekly S412 David COOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Geoffrey C. Fleck, Special Asst. Public Defender of Friend, Fleck & Gettis, South Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In Cook v. State, 542 So.2d 964 (Fla.1989), this Court affirmed Cook's convictions for the murders of Onelia and Rolando Betancourt. However, because we eliminated two of the aggravating circumstances, we quashed the death sentence imposed for the death of Onelia and remanded for resentencing by the judge. Cook now appeals the new sentence of death. We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(1), of the Florida Constitution.

The Betancourts worked as the midnight cleaning crew at a Burger King in South Miami. Cook murdered them during an attempted late-night robbery of the restaurant. The facts of these murders are set forth in our prior opinion in this case. See Cook. At Cook's original sentencing hearing, a majority of the jury recommended the death penalty. On resentencing, the trial judge found the following aggravating circumstances: 1) the defendant was previously convicted of another capital felony; 1 2) the murder was committed during a robbery; and 3) the murder was committed for pecuniary gain. 2 The judge merged factors 2 and 3 into one aggravating factor. In mitigation the judge found that the defendant had no significant history of prior criminal activity. 3

On this appeal Cook first claims that his sentence of death for Onelia's murder is disproportionate both to the sentences of his two accomplices and to the sentences of other defendants convicted of similar crimes. Included in this claim is Cook's assertion that the judge improperly considered aggravating factors found by this Court to be inapplicable in Cook's prior appeal. See Cook, 542 So.2d at 970 (Onelia's murder was not heinous, atrocious, or cruel and was not committed to eliminate a witness). We reject the claim that the judge considered the inapplicable aggravating factors. The written sentencing order clearly states that the judge did not find these factors and, therefore, gave them no weight when imposing the death sentence. We have reviewed the judge's statement concerning the witness-elimination factor at the oral sentencing, but do not interpret it to say that he considered this inapplicable factor when sentencing Cook.

We also reject Cook's claim concerning his accomplices' sentences since their level of participation in the murder was clearly less than Cook's. See Cook. It was Cook, not his accomplices, who killed the Betancourts. We also believe that Cook's sentence is not disproportional when compared to other defendants' sentences for similar murders. The court found two statutory aggravating factors, one being a prior capital felony, and only one statutory mitigating factor. We have affirmed death sentences in cases involving similar factors and circumstances. See Freeman v. State, 563 So.2d 73 (Fla.1990), petition for cert. filed, No. 90-6029 (U.S. Oct. 22, 1990); LeCroy v. State, 533 So.2d 750 (Fla.1988), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 925, 109 S.Ct. 3262, 106 L.Ed.2d 607 (1989).

Cook next claims that the trial judge's written sentencing order fails to comport with the requirements of law because the judge did not adequately discuss the evidence Cook offered in mitigation. In the resentencing order the trial judge specifically adopted the discussion of mitigating evidence contained in his original sentencing order. In that order the judge discussed the reasons why each statutory mitigating factor listed in section 921.141(6), Florida Statutes (1989), did or did not apply in this case. As to nonstatutory mitigating factors, the judge noted in the resentencing order that

[d]efense counsel argues numerous purported non-statutory mitigating factors in a written submission, however, the Court does not believe that they exist, or those that do exist have so little weight when compared to the two aggravating factors, so as to have no weight at all.

He concluded "that insufficient mitigating circumstances, either statutory or non-statutory exist, as demonstrated by any testimony or facts, ... to outweigh the aggravating circumstances."

Cook most heavily relies on evidence of his substance abuse. Dr. Haber, a clinical psychiatrist, testified that Cook told her that he had been using drugs and alcohol for three years and that he had taken substantial quantities of both on the night of the killings. She expressed the opinion that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Shere v. Moore
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • September 12, 2002
    ...against the defendant); Mordenti v. State, 630 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1994) (codefendant received immunity for her testimony);9 Cook v. State, 581 So.2d 141 (Fla.1991) (codefendants pled guilty to second-degree murder and received sentences of twenty-three and twenty-four years); Hayes v. State, ......
  • Deparvine v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • September 29, 2008
    ...that the trial court would have imposed the death penalty in light of finding five aggravating circumstances); see also Cook v. State, 581 So.2d 141, 143-44 (Fla. 1991) (holding that trial court erred in failing to mention mitigation evidence, but that the error was harmless "particularly i......
  • State v. Riechmann
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 24, 2000
  • Cook v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 28, 2001
    ...if the sentencing order had contained findings that each of the nonstatutory mitigating circumstances had been proven. Cook v. State, 581 So.2d 141, 142-44 (Fla.1991). On October 7, 1991, the United States Supreme Court denied Cook's petition for writ of certiorari. See Cook v. Florida, 502......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT