Cooper v. Alabama, 32
| Decision Date | 14 October 1963 |
| Docket Number | M,No. 32,32 |
| Parties | Grant COOPER v. ALABAMA. isc |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Grant Cooper, pro se.
Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen. of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Alabama for further consideration in light of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477, 83 S.Ct. 768, 9 L.Ed.2d 892.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
State v. Griffiths
... ... Bean v. Diamond Alkali Co., 93 Idaho 32, 454 P.2d 69 (1969), states: ... "An expert is generally defined as someone possessing a certain ... ...
-
Morrison v. State
...that the trial court ruled correctly." Cooper v. State, 274 Ala. 471, 149 So.2d 834, vacated on other grounds, 375 U.S. 23, 84 S.Ct. 84, 11 L.Ed.2d 43 (1963). "Substantial error is not presumed, but the burden is upon the appellant to show error." Edwards v. State, 274 Ala. 569, 570, 150 So......
-
State v. Ratliff
...for use on appeal, a free transcript of the evidence submitted on a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Cooper v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 23, 84 S.Ct. 84, 11 L.Ed.2d 43. We find no express authority granted by the Ohio statutes, either to the trial court or to an appellate court, to furnish a......
-
Thomas v. State, 4 Div. 449
...that the trial court ruled correctly." Cooper v. State, 274 Ala. 471, 149 So.2d 834, vacated on other grounds, 375 U.S. 23, 84 S.Ct. 84, 11 L.Ed.2d 43 (1963). "When there is no showing to the contrary, the presumption is always in favor of correct action on the part of the trial judge." Bal......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Survey of Washington Search and Seizure Law
...supporting the knock and announce rule and the particular facts and circumstances of each individual case. See, e.g., Ker v. California, 375 U.S. 23, 33, 10 L. Ed. 2d 726, 738, 83 S. Ct. 1623, 1629-30 (1963); State v. Myers, 102 Wash. 2d 548, 689 P.2d 38 (1984). See generally 2 LaFave, Sear......