COOPER V. COOPER
| Docket Number | No. CV-13-58 |
| Decision Date | 18 December 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Langston v. Brown
...666, 742 S.W.2d 551, 552 (1987).42 Zimmerman v. Pope, 2015 Ark. App. 499, at 13, 471 S.W.3d 646, 655 (citing Cooper v. Cooper, 2013 Ark. App. 748, at 9, 431 S.W.3d 349, 355 ).43 Id. (citing City of Greenbrier v. Roberts, 354 Ark. 591, 594, 127 S.W.3d 454, 456 (2003) ).44 The initial judge d......
-
Zimmerman v. Pope
...no citation to authority or convincing legal argument, nor will we research or develop an argument for appellant. Cooper v. Cooper,2013 Ark. App. 748, at 9, 431 S.W.3d 349, 355. It is impossible for our court to conduct a meaningful review in a case where the appellant offers no authority o......
-
Nesbitt v. Nesbitt
...de novo on the record but will not reverse a finding of fact by the trial court unless it is clearly erroneous. Cooper v. Cooper , 2013 Ark. App. 748, 431 S.W.3d 349. A finding is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court, on the entire evidence, is left with the definite and firm convicti......
-
Neidhardt v. Neidhardt
...has no citation to authority or convincing legal argument, nor will we research or develop an argument for appellant. Cooper v. Cooper, 2013 Ark. App. 748, 431 S.W.3d 349. As we stated above, the circuit court made the required acknowledgement of its unequal distribution of the property, an......
Get Started for Free