Cooper v. Jacobs
Decision Date | 13 June 1887 |
Citation | 2 So. 832,82 Ala. 411 |
Parties | COOPER AND ANOTHER v. JACOBS AND ANOTHER. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Calhoun county.
Trial of the right of property.
Bishop & Hanna, for appellants.
Brothers, Willett & Willett, contra.
The execution issued by the justice of the peace, HITTON, was properly excluded from admission in evidence; being void on its face. It fails to show in whose favor it was issued, and amounted to nothing more than a roving commission to any constable of the county to make a certain sum of money out of the goods and chattels of Hays & Roberts. The indorsement on the back of the execution was no part of it, and cannot be looked to in aid of this fatal defect. Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Barrett v. Brownlee
... ... Allen & ... Bell, of Birmingham, for appellee ... DE ... GRAFFENRIED, J ... In the ... case of Cooper & Co. v. Jacobs & Belsinger, 82 Ala ... 411, 2 So. 832, this court, through Somerville, J., said: ... "The execution issued by the justice of the ... ...
-
McDonald v. State
... ... [2 So. 832.] ... our constitution. Mayor, etc., Mobile, v ... Yuille, 3 Ala. 137; Dorsey's Case, 7 ... Port. (Ala.) 295; Cooper v ... Schultz, 32 How. Pr. 107, and authorities cited; ... Coe v. Schultz, 47 Barb. 64; ... Metropolitan Board of Health v ... Heister, 37 N.Y ... ...
-
Smith v. Bell
...43 Mo. 322; 1 Freem. Ex'ns, § 43. A conclusion to the contrary was reached by the supreme court of Alabama in the case of Cooper v. Jacobs, 82 Ala. 411, 2 South. 832, but we think the better view is stated by the supreme courts of New York and Michigan in the cases cited supra. There is not......
-
Smith v. Bell
... ... 322; 1 Freem. Ex'ns, § 43. A ... conclusion to the contrary was reached by the supreme court ... of Alabama in the case of Cooper v. Jacobs, 82 Ala ... 411, 2 So. 832, but we think the better view is stated by the ... supreme courts of New York and Michigan in the cases cited ... ...