Cooper Village, Inc. v. Moretti, 79-302
| Decision Date | 30 April 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-302,79-302 |
| Citation | 383 So.2d 705 |
| Parties | COOPER VILLAGE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Frank A. MORETTI and Susan M. Moretti, his wife, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Ira M. Krauss of the Law Offices of Kenneth P. Wurtenberger, P. A., Lauderhill, for appellant.
Barry G. Roderman of the Law Offices of Barry G. Roderman, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
Cooper Village, Inc., seeks review by interlocutory appeal of an order denying its motion to discharge a notice of lis pendens. Such an order is not reviewable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Section 48.23, Florida Statutes (1978), authorizes the court to control and discharge a notice of lis pendens as the court may grant and dissolve injunctions. However, this does not make an order granting or denying a motion to discharge a notice of lis pendens an order pertaining to injunctions within the purview of Rule 9.130(b); it simply means that the circuit court is to utilize the procedural standards or principles applicable to the granting or discharging of injunctions when considering a motion to grant or discharge a notice of lis pendens. However, since the notice of lis pendens affects the alienability of Cooper Village's real property and could cause Cooper Village injury which may not be remediable on plenary appeal, we have decided to treat the matter as a petition for common law certiorari. Hallmark Manufacturing Inc. v. Lujack Construction Company, 372 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
We have read the briefs in this cause and have concluded that Cooper Village has failed to demonstrate that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law when it denied Cooper Village's motion to discharge the notice of lis pendens.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for common law certiorari.
Petition denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., Inc., U-HAUL
...discharge a notice of lis pendens; and if it fails to do so, the property owner may seek certiorari. See Cooper Village, Inc. v. Moretti, 383 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Fourth, most important to the present case, we did not, by our decision in Procacci, eliminate any of the foregoing re......
-
Loidl v. I & E Group, Inc., 2D05-3984.
...injunction. Additionally, the order itself dissolving a notice of lis pendens is not "injunctive" relief. See Cooper Village, Inc. v. Moretti, 383 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Although such an order may dissolve a party's notice of pending litigation, it is not an order which directs or p......
-
Loidl v. I&E Group, Inc., Case No. 2D05-3984 (FL 3/8/2006)
...injunction. Additionally, the order itself dissolving a notice of lis pendens is not "injunctive" relief. See Cooper Village, Inc. v. Moretti, 383 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Although such an order may dissolve a party's notice of pending litigation, it is not an order which directs or ......
-
Delta Aggregate, LLC v. Hermes Hialeah Warehouse, LLC
...review over such orders. See Kennedy Real Estate Found. v. Goldberg, 436 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) ; Cooper Vill., Inc. v. Moretti, 383 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) ; see also Archer v. Archer, 692 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The third district exercises non-final review but has r......