Copeland v. Clarke, 012319 FED4, 18-7338
|Opinion Judge:||PER CURIAM|
|Party Name:||SENTRELL LEVERT COPELAND, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.|
|Attorney:||SENTRELL LEVERT COPELAND, APPELLANT PRO SE.|
|Judge Panel:||BEFORE WILKINSON AND DUNCAN, CIRCUIT JUDGES, AND HAMILTON, SENIOR CIRCUIT JUDGE.|
|Case Date:||January 23, 2019|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit|
SUBMITTED: JANUARY 17, 2019
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, AT NORFOLK. ARENDA L. WRIGHT ALLEN, DISTRICT JUDGE. (2:17-CV-00093-AWA-RJK)
SENTRELL LEVERT COPELAND, APPELLANT PRO SE.
BEFORE WILKINSON AND DUNCAN, CIRCUIT JUDGES, AND HAMILTON, SENIOR CIRCUIT JUDGE.
DISMISSED BY UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION.
UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS ARE NOT BINDING PRECEDENT IN THIS CIRCUIT.
Sentrell Levert Copeland seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Copeland that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Copeland failed to file objections, so the district court accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissed Copeland's petition for habeas relief.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP