Coppage v. North Dakota
| Docket Number | 20130180 |
| Decision Date | 11 March 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
9 cases
-
Elk v. State
...and should correct it if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.’ " Coppage v. State , 2014 ND 42, ¶ 30, 843 N.W.2d 291 (quoting State v. Chacano , 2013 ND 8, ¶ 9, 826 N.W.2d 294 ). The State did not properly preserve its objection to the s......
-
Howard v. Braun
...in the context of the entire trial, was sufficiently prejudicial to violate a defendant's due process rights. Coppage v. State, 2014 ND 42, 843 N.W.2d 291, 299-300. This second claim is not supported by any fact or admissible evidence. There has been no reference or citation made to the rec......
-
Yoney v. State
...granted to Pemberton would seriously affect the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the criminal jury trial. See Coppage v. State , 2014 ND 42, ¶¶ 30, 34-35, 843 N.W.2d 291 (noticing obvious error and granting postconviction relief on the basis of the Dominguez decision); Whitman ......
-
Steinbach v. State
...the district court's factual findings will not be disturbed on appeal unless the findings are clearly erroneous. Coppage v. State, 2014 ND 42, ¶ 14, 843 N.W.2d 291. A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, it is not supported by any evidence, ......
Get Started for Free