Copsey v. Park

Decision Date24 May 2017
Docket NumberNo. 34, Sept. Term, 2016,34, Sept. Term, 2016
Citation160 A.3d 623,453 Md. 141
Parties Jenny J. COPSEY, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lance D. Copsey, Deceased, et. al. v. John S. PARK, et. al.
CourtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland

Argued by William E. Artz (Thomas M. Wochok, William E. Artz, P.C., Tysons Corner, VA; Paul D. Bekman, Bekman, Marder & Adkins, LLC, Baltimore, MD; Brian Nash, Nash & Associates, LLC, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Respondents.

Michael J. Winkelman, Esquire, McCarthy, Winkelman & Mester, L.L.P., Lanham, MD, for Amicus Curiae Maryland Association for Justice.

Argued by James L. Shea (Mitchell Y. Mirviss, Venable LLP, Baltimore, MD; Michael K. Wiggins, J. Kristin Wiggins, Wharton Levin Ehrmantrout & Klein, Annapolis, MD), on brief, for Respondents.

Mark D. Gately, Esquire, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Baltimore, MD, Jessica L. Ellsworth, Esquire, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae of Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society of Maryland, Inc. and the Medical and Chirurgical Faculty of Maryland, d/b/a Medchi, the Maryland State Medical Society.

Barbera, C.J. Greene, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, Lawrence F. Rodowsky, (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.

Greene, J.

In this case, Jenny J. Copsey, the widow of Lance D. Copsey, individually and as the personal representative of the Estate of Lance D. Copsey, deceased, along with the minor children and mother of the decedent are the petitioners. They allege that the respondents, John S. Park, M.D. ("Dr. Park") and his employer, Brown, Croft and Frazier, P.A. ("Annapolis Radiology"), were negligent when Dr. Park interpreted radiological images on June 4, 2010, leading to Lance D. Copsey's ("Mr. Copsey") fatal stroke on June 10, 2010. Initially, the petitioners sued Dr. Park and three subsequent treating physicians, along with their employers. Prior to trial, however, the petitioners partially settled their claims and dismissed two of the doctors and their employer. A day after trial had begun, the petitioners also dismissed the remaining subsequent treating physician. The trial judge denied the petitioners' motions in limine which opposed the admission of evidence regarding the non-parties' statuses as former defendants and Dr. Park's raising the defense that the negligence of subsequent treating physicians was an intervening and superseding cause of Mr. Copsey's death.

We shall hold that evidence of non-party negligence was relevant and necessary in providing Dr. Park a fair trial as it tended to show he was not negligent; thus, the alleged prejudice did not outweigh its probative value. Further, causation was an issue for the jury to determine and Dr. Park presented sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that he was not negligent; and if found to be negligent, his negligence was superseded by the independent and extraordinary negligence of others. Accordingly, we shall affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals which held that both of the motions in limine were properly denied because the Martinez case permits the introduction into evidence of non-party negligence and causation. Martinez ex rel. Fielding v. Johns Hopkins Hosp. , 212 Md.App. 634, 70 A.3d 397 (2013).

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mr. Copsey had several risk factors for stroke

including moderate obesity, hypercholesterolemia,1 hypertension, and a smoking habit. On February 4, 2010, Mr. Copsey was presented to the Anne Arundel Medical Center ("AAMC") emergency room after slipping, falling, and hitting the back of his head while playing racquetball. He complained of nausea and a headache. The hospital released him after treatment and a reportedly normal cranial CT scan.

Three months later, on May 26, 2010, Mr. Copsey returned to the AAMC emergency room. He complained of recurring episodes of dizziness since the morning of May 26. Another CT scan

revealed normal results. He was referred to his internal medicine physician, Aditya Chopra, M.D. ("Dr. Chopra"), for a follow-up appointment.

On June 1, 2010, Mr. Copsey saw Dr. Chopra. Mr. Copsey complained of difficulty walking, nausea, headaches, and persistent vertigo. Dr. Chopra prescribed a generic brand of Dramamine

and antibiotics and suggested Mr. Copsey consult an ophthalmologist and, if the symptoms did not improve, also advised him to see an ear, nose, and throat doctor. Mr. Copsey did meet with an ophthalmologist, on June 2, 2010, who determined there was no ophthalmological etiology for his diplopia2 and recommended a neurologic consultation and a neuroradiologic evaluation.

On June 4, 2010, Mr. Copsey returned to see Dr. Chopra who performed both of the recommended neurological assessments and found signs of neurological problems and thus advised Mr. Copsey to return to the emergency room for immediate attention. On that afternoon, Mr. Copsey returned to the AAMC emergency room. He told Charles Iliff, M.D. ("Dr. Iliff"), that he had vertigo occurring for about a week, numbness in the right side of his face, right arm, and right leg, headaches, mild shortness of breath, mild diplopia

, and trouble walking. Dr. Iliff's examination of Mr. Copsey was normal, but after consulting with a neurologist, Larry Blum, M.D. ("Dr. Blum"), a CT scan and a brain MRI/MRA3 were conducted.

On the same date, a radiologist, Dr. Park, interpreted the CT scan

at 4:02 p.m. and the MRI/MRA at 6:45 p.m. Dr. Park reported an allegedly normal CT scan and MRI/MRA. Specifically, he found:

There is no evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage

, infarction, mass effect, or midline shift. No abnormal extraaxial fluid collections are identified. The ventricles, sulci, and cisterns are normal. There is no acute injury to the skull base or calvarium.

There is normal anatomy of the circle of Willis with no evidence of aneurysm, anteriovenous malformation, or abnormal vessel cut-off. No hemodynamically significant stenosis is identified. Incidental note is made of fenestration of the left vertebral artery.

There is no evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage, infarction, mass effect, or midline shift. No abnormal extraaxial fluid collections are identified. The ventricles, sulci, and cisterns are normal. The flow voids at the skull base are normal. There is no acute injury to the skull base or calvarium.

On June 5, 2010, Dr. Blum independently reviewed the MRI and MRA images after Dr. Park and also confirmed there were no abnormalities. Dr. Blum believed Mr. Copsey's symptoms were merely evidence of migraines. Mr. Copsey was discharged on June 6, 2010, and diagnosed with migraines, cluster migraines, vertigo, hypercholesterolemia, mildly elevated blood pressure, and hypertension

; his discharge summary indicated he was "otherwise doing fine."

On June 7, 2010, Mr. Copsey was seen by Dr. Chopra for outpatient evaluation. Mr. Copsey indicated he had no chest pain, dizziness, shortness of breath, cough

, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, aches or pains, headache, or burning urination. Dr. Chopra noted that Mr. Copsey had no neurological issues and told him to go back to the emergency room or follow-up with Dr. Blum if his symptoms returned. His symptoms did return towards the end of the day, but he did not return to see Dr. Blum at AAMC for a follow-up evaluation until June 9, 2010.

At the follow-up, Mr. Copsey stated that his symptoms, including diplopia

and headaches, had returned and that he had begun experiencing hiccups and trouble swallowing. Mr. Copsey's neurological exam was normal, but the new symptoms concerned Dr. Blum. Thus, he ordered an urgent interpretation of a new brain MRI, writing "*STAT*" on the order form and telling Mr. Copsey to return to him with the results. Dr. Blum's requisition to the radiologist specified an urgent call back from the radiologist. Vijay Viswanathan, M.D. ("Dr. Viswanathan"), in the radiology department, interpreted the MRI at 4:02 p.m. and noted:

1. Ill-defined new band-like signal abnormality within the right lateral medulla which is nonspecific but is concerning for acute infarction. This is a new finding since the prior study dated June 4, 2010.
2. This could be suggestive of lateral medullary syndrome

/Wallenberg syndrome.

3. Left vertebral artery abnormal flow void which is nonspecific. It is difficult to appreciate the connection between right medullary abnormality and left vertebral artery abnormality. Clinical correlation advised.

4. No evidence of intraorbital pathology.

I discussed these findings with Dr. Alkaitis, covering physician for Dr. Blum at 1030 p.m., 6–9–10.

An "infarction" is brain-cell death caused by insufficient flow of blood. Dr. Viswanathan dictated the report at 4:42 p.m., but it was not until 10:30 p.m. that Dr. Viswanathan notified the on-call neurologist, Damanhuri Alkaitis, M.D., ("Dr. Alkaitis") of the findings. Dr. Viswanathan did not report these results to Dr. Blum, as he was asked to do, or anyone else at AAMC or to Mr. Copsey.

Mr. Copsey returned to see Dr. Blum around 6 p.m. with the images. In his report, Dr. Blum reflected that the radiology department never called him despite his request for an urgent call back. However, Dr. Blum could have accessed Dr. Viswanathan's findings earlier by checking the Medical Center's computer database or by contacting the radiology department. He reviewed the images himself and found no abnormalities. Thus, Dr. Blum released Mr. Copsey from the hospital. Mr. Copsey had already been released by the time Dr. Viswanathannotified Dr. Alkaitis of the MRI results at 10:30 p.m. Mr. Copsey was not informed that a lateral medullary infarct had been discovered nor did Dr. Viswanathan or Dr. Alkaitis take any action in contacting Mr. Copsey, his family, or arranging for an ambulance to transport Mr. Copsey back to the hospital emergency room for treatment that night.

On June 10, 2010 at approximately 4:00 a.m., Mr. Copsey suffered a stroke

when he woke up to use the bathroom. His wife took him to the AAMC emergency room after she...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Barbosa v. Osbourne
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • 26 avril 2018
    ...Med. Sys. Corp. , 398 Md. 67, 82, 919 A.2d 1177 (2007) ; Copsey v. Park , 228 Md. App. 107, 119, 137 A.3d 299 (2016), aff'd , 453 Md. 141, 160 A.3d 623 (2017).IV As noted, the Barbosas contend that the trial court erred in permitting Dr. Osbourne to raise a contributory negligence defense a......
  • McCoy v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • 25 janvier 2021
    ...when it is "1) a cause in fact, and 2) a legally cognizable cause." Pittway, 409 Md. at 243, 973 A.2d at 786; see Copsey v. Park, 453 Md. 141, 164, 160 A.3d 623, 636 (2017). The Maryland Court of Appeals has explained, Pittway, 409 Md. at 243-44, 973 A.2d at 786:In other words, before liabi......
  • State v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • 4 septembre 2019
    ...it is "1) a cause in fact, and 2) a legally cognizable cause." Pittway , 409 Md. at 243, 973 A.2d at 786 ; see Copsey v. Park , 453 Md. 141, 164, 160 A.3d 623, 636 (2017).The Maryland Court of Appeals has explained, Pittway , 409 Md. at 243–44, 973 A.2d at 786 :In other words, before liabil......
  • Am. Radiology Servs., LLC v. Reiss
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • 24 août 2020
    ...testimony from the Plaintiff's experts. The Defendants opposed the motion. Prior to trial, the judge ruled that under Copsey v. Park , 453 Md. 141, 160 A.3d 623 (2017), and Martinez ex rel. Fielding v. John Hopkins Hospital , 212 Md. App. 634, 70 A.3d 397 (2013) , the Defendants would be p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT