Corder v. Corder
| Decision Date | 25 November 1904 |
| Citation | 59 A. 309 |
| Parties | CORDER v. CORDER. |
| Court | New Jersey Court of Chancery |
Petition for divorce by Annie Corder against Herman Corder.Heard on exceptions to the master's report that the petition be dismissed.Dismissed.
Lewis, Besson & Stevens, for petitioner.
The original separation of the husband and wife in this case, and the circumstances of it, are proved only by the oath of the petitioner.The corroboration of petitioner as to the fact that subsequent to the separation the wife lived alone is not a sufficient corroboration of the desertion charged.It proves the continuance of a separation, but not that the original separation was a desertion.The rule that no divorce can be granted on the uncorroborated evidence of the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Tuttle v. Tuttle
...N.W. 270; Grady v. Grady, N.J.Eq. , 64 A. 440; Gunther v. Gunther, N.J.Eq. , 57 A. 1015; Hunt v. Hunt, N.J.Eq. , 59 A. 642; Corder v. Corder, N.J.Eq. , 59 A. 309; Goodhues v. Goodhues, 90 Md. 292, 44 A. Luther v. Luther, 87 Ill.App. 241; 14 Cyc. 688, 689; Hagle v. Hagle, 74 Cal. 608, 16 P. ......
-
Bell v. Bell
...Hayes v. Hayes, 144 Cal. 627, 78 P. 19; Berry v. Berry, 145 Cal. 787, 79 P. 532; Gunther v. Gunther (N. J. Ch.), 57 A. 1015; Corder v. Corder (N. J. Ch.), 59 A. 309; Sabin v. Sabin (N. J. Ch.), 59 A. 627; Hunt Hunt (N. J. Ch.), 59 A. 642; Hagle v. Hagle, 74 Cal. 608, 16 P. 518; Haley v. Hal......