Cornelius Lawrence, Plaintiff In Error v. Gilbert Allen and Samuel Paxton
Decision Date | 01 January 1849 |
Citation | 12 L.Ed. 914,7 How. 785,48 U.S. 785 |
Parties | CORNELIUS W. LAWRENCE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. GILBERT ALLEN AND SAMUEL C. PAXTON |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial29 cases
-
Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. U.S.
...ornaments, as shells, were held to be `shells,' and not `manufactures of shell.' The question is fully discussed in Lawrence v. Allen, 48 U.S. 785, 7 How. 785, 12 L.Ed. 914, in which, however, it was held that India rubber shoes made in Brazil, by simply allowing the sap of the India rubber......
-
First Nat. Bank of Anamoose v. United States
... ... A. Bangs, of Grand Forks, N.D., and Lawrence Maxwell, of ... Cincinnati, Ohio (George R ... for plaintiff in error ... Edward ... Engerud, U.S ... 263, 10 L.Ed. 154; Lawrence v. Allen, 7 How. 785, 12 ... L.Ed. 914; Washington ... ...
-
In re I. Rheinstrom & Sons Co.
...but was free from duty, as being unmanufactured. The second case was the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Lawrence v. Allen, 7 How. 785, 12 L.Ed. 914, which he states was to the effect that india rubber made in Brazil by simply allowing the sap of the india rubber tree to harden......
-
Union Wire Rope Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.
...Castro, 153 U. S. 32, 14 S. Ct. 766, 38 L. Ed. 624; Hartranft v. Wiegmann, 121 U. S. 609, 7 S. Ct. 1240, 30 L. Ed. 1012; Lawrence v. Allen, 7 How. 785, 12 L. Ed. 914; United States v. Hathaway, 4 Wall. 404, 18 L. Ed. 395; United States v. Potts, 5 Cranch, 284, 3 L. Ed. 102; In re Tecopa Min......
Request a trial to view additional results