Cornells v. Shannon
Decision Date | 10 September 1894 |
Docket Number | 409. |
Citation | 63 F. 305 |
Parties | CORNELLS, Judge, et al. v. SHANNON et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
N. B Maxey (S. S. Fears and G. B. Denison were with him on the brief), for appellants.
G. W Pasco, for appellees.
Before CALDWELL, SANBORN, and THAYER, Circuit Judges.
An act of the council of the Creek Nation entitled 'An act establishing quarantine regulations against foreign cattle and to prevent smuggling cattle into the Creek Nation,' approved October 29, 1891, makes it unlawful for any citizen of the Nation 'to introduce or invite into the Creek Nation cattle of any kind at any time,' except between the first day of January and the last day of March of each year, and declares that any citizen violating this provision of the act 'shall be fined a sum that will be the equivalent of three dollars per head for each and every head of cattle' unlawfully introduced. The act makes the judgment a lien on the cattle unlawfully introduced, and provides that, if the judgment is not paid in 30 days, the cattle shall be sold to satisfy it. In a proceeding instituted in the criminal court of the Muskogee district against George Shannon and James Willison, charging them with introducing 10,000 head of cattle into the Nation in violation of this act, that court entered the following judgment:
'Judge's Office, Muskogee Nation, Wellington, 18 Aug., '92.
'Muskogee Nation vs. George Shannon, James Willison.
'For Violating Creek Cattle Law of Oct. 29, 1891.
'Temaye Cornells, Judge Muskogee District, M.N.'
After the entry of the judgment, process was issued to the captain of the light-horse company (an officer exercising duties similar to those of a sheriff) commanding him to collect the judgment, and not to permit the cattle to be removed from Muskogee district until the judgment was paid. The captain of the light-horse company took possession of the cattle, and thereupon Shannon and Willison, claiming to be the owners of the cattle, and Godair, Harding & Co., claiming to have a mortgage upon the cattle, filed this bill against Temaye Cornells, as captain of the light horse of the same district and Nation, alleging that 'plaintiffs, and each and every one of them, speaking for themselves individually and collectively, further say that said pretended judgment is unjust, utterly void, and of no effect as to them, because they have never, nor have any of them ever, introduced any cattle into said district, nor into any other portion...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Macarthur v. San Juan County
...omitted).) 176. See also Mehlin v. Ice, 56 F. 12, 19 (8th Cir.1893); Exendine v. Pore, 56 F. 777 (8th Cir.1893); Cornells v. Shannon, 63 F. 305 (8th Cir.1894); Raymond v. Raymond, 83 F. 721 (8th Cir.1897). As one recent commentary [T]he Eighth Circuit decided several similar cases, each inv......
-
Tracy v. Superior Court of Maricopa County
...v. CIT Fin. Servs. Corp., 87 N.M. 362, 533 P.2d 751 (1975); In re Buehl, 87 Wash.2d 649, 555 P.2d 1334 (1976); see also Cornells v. Shannon, 63 F. 305, 306 (8th Cir.1894); Standley v. Roberts, 59 F. 836, 845 (8th Cir.1894); Mehlin v. Ice, 56 F. 12, 19 (8th Cir.1893) (recognizing Indian trib......
-
Garcia v. Gutierrez
...the Eighth Circuit held that Indian tribes were territories under the then-existing full faith and credit statute. See Cornells v. Shannon, 63 F. 305, 306 (8th Cir.1894); Standley v. Roberts, 59 F. 836, 845 (8th Cir.1894); Mehlin v. Ice, 56 F. 12, 19 (8th Cir.1893). Not all observers agree ......
-
Nygaard v. Taylor
...Indian tribes were territories under the then-existing full faith and credit statute." Garcia, 217 P.3d at 605 (citing Cornells v. Shannon, 63 F. 305, 306 (8th Cir. 1894) ; Standley v. Roberts, 59 F. 836, 845 (8th Cir. 1894) ; Mehlin v. Ice, 56 F. 12, 19 (8th Cir. 1893) ).13 In In re Larch,......