Coronato v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, A--225
| Decision Date | 18 May 1949 |
| Docket Number | No. A--225,A--225 |
| Parties | CORONATO v. PUBLIC SERVICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT. |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
Before McGEEHAN, Senior Judge, and DONGES and COLIE, JJ.
David M. Sellick, Newark, argued the cause for appellant (Carl T. Freggens, Newark, attorney).
Francis X. Kenneally, Newark, argued the cause for respondent (Joseph P. Dunn, Newark, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is the employer's appeal from a judgment of the Passaic County Court affirming an award of compensation to the employee in the Workmen's Compensation Bureau.
The testimony was in sharp conflict on several essential phases and that conflict raised a grave doubt as to the veracity of the petitioner. The deputy commissioner who heard the case and had the benefit of seeing the witnesses and observing the manner in which they testified resolved the question of credibility in favor of the petitioner as did the county court. A reversal of this judgment would have to turn upon a finding by this court that the petitioner's testimony was unworthy of belief. A careful scrutiny of the record does not justify such a finding in light of contrary holdings in the bureau and the county court. As was said in Reis v. Breeze Corporation, Inc., 129 N.J.L. 138, 28 A.2d 304, 305 (Sup.Ct.1942) "Where two independent and distinct tribunals such as these (viz., the Workmen's Compensation Bureau and the Court of Common Pleas) have examined the facts and heard the testimony, we do not think that a conclusion so reached should be lightly disturbed by this court upon a mere inspection of the written word, where there is ample support in the testimony for the conclusion so reached.' * * *'
For the reasons stated, the judgment under appeal is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jensen v. Wilhelms Const. Co.
...Giresi v. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co., Inc., 7 N.J.Super. 41, 71 A.2d 725 (App.Div.1950); Coronato v. Public Service Coordinated Transport,4 N.J.Super. 1, 66 A.2d 196 (App.Div. 1949), we will reverse when we are satisfied the finding is not supported by sufficient evidence. See Cirillo v. ......
-
Fox v. City of Plainfield, A--470
...evidence. Giresi v. E. I. duPont deNemours Co., Inc., 7 N.J.Super. 41, 71 A.2d 725 (App.Div.1950); Coronato v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, 4 N.J.Super. 1, 66 A.2d 196 (App.Div.1949). The legal result is of course not affected by the fact that Fox was suffering from a preexisting d......
-
Ginter v. Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Corp., Lamp Division
...Giresi v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 7 N.J.Super. 41, 71 A.2d 725 (App.Div.1950); Coronato v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, 4 N.J.Super. 1, 66 A.2d 196 (App.Div.1949); Ali v. Star Restaurant, N.J.Super. The sole question for our determination is whether, plaintiff having ......
-
City of Orange v. De Stefano
...under review. Reis v. Breeze Corporations, Inc., 129 N.J.L. 138, 142, 28 A.2d 304 (Sup.Ct.1942); Coronato v. Public Service Coordinated Transport., 4 N.J.Super. 1, 66 A.2d 196 (App.Div.1949). There was ample credible evidence to support the findings against, and the dismissal, of The improp......