Corsbie v. Poore, 6 Div. 735.
| Decision Date | 24 October 1940 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 735. |
| Citation | Corsbie v. Poore, 198 So. 272, 240 Ala. 207 (Ala. 1940) |
| Parties | PAUL CORSBIE ET AL. v. J. N. POORE. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
W. L. Chenault, of Russellville, for petitioners.
Fite and Fite, of Hamilton, opposed.
Petition of Paul Corsbie and Ervin Sutherland for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Corsbie et al. v. Poore, 198 So. 268.
Writ denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Houlton v. State
...29, 36 So.2d 556, certiorari denied 251 Ala. 144, 36 So.2d 558; Corsbie v. Poore, 29 Ala.App. 487, 198 So. 268, certiorari denied 240 Ala. 207, 198 So. 272. The trial judge gave a full and clear oral charge to the jury. In addition he gave some fourteen written instructions at the appellant......
-
Echols v. State
...348, 34 So.2d 608; certiorari denied 250 Ala. 396, 34 So.2d 614; Corsbie v. Poore, 29 Ala.App. 487, 198 So. 268; certiorari denied 240 Ala. 207, 198 So. 272; Helms v. State, 34 Ala.App. 82, 37 So.2d 229; certiorari denied 251 Ala. 275, 37 So.2d 231; Rountree Farm Co. v. Morgan County, 249 A......
-
Montgomery Production Credit Ass'n v. M. Hohenberg & Co.
...agent in the case in which the question of agency arises. Corsbie v. Poore, 29 Ala.App. 487, 490, 198 So. 268, certiorari denied 240 Ala. 207, 198 So. 272; 2 Am.Jur., Sec. 446, p. 353. Hence the propriety of Moseley's testimony to this effect. And where the fact of agency is uncontroverted-......