Costner v. United States, 6041.
| Decision Date | 10 March 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 6041.,6041. |
| Citation | 180 F.2d 892 |
| Parties | COSTNER v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Isaac Costner, pro se.
J. B. Craven, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Morganton, N. C. (Thomas A. Uzzell, Jr., U. S. Atty., Asheville, N. C., on the brief), for appellee.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion made under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 by a prisoner who had been released from custody prior to the expiration of his sentence because of "good time" earned during the course of his imprisonment. The relief asked by the motion was that appellant be relieved of the conditions imposed by the prison authorities upon his release.
Even if the court had jurisdiction to grant the relief sought upon a motion made under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, it is clear that such relief should not be granted. 18 U.S.C.A. § 4164 expressly provides that prisoners entitled to "good time" deductions from their sentences shall be treated as paroled prisoners until the expiration of their terms. Gould v. Green, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 363, 141 F.2d 533; Story v. Rives, 68 App. D.C. 325, 97 F.2d 182. The pertinent portion of that section is as follows: "A prisoner having served the term or terms for which he shall have been sentenced after June 29, 1932, less good time deductions, shall upon release be treated as if released on parole, and shall be subject to all provisions of law relating to the parole of United States prisoners until the expiration of the maximum term or terms for which he was sentenced."
We think it clear, however, that the court has no jurisdiction to entertain a motion of this sort under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, which merely provides a remedy in the nature of writ of error coram nobis for attacking the judgment and sentence under which a prisoner is incarcerated. The attack here is not upon the judgment of the court, but upon action of the prison authorities.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Huss, 1248
...statute, 12 or the Administrative Procedure Act and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. We are reenforced in that construction by Costner v. United States,180 F.2d 892 (4th Cir. 1950). That case held that § 2255 is not available to challenge federal prison authorities' calculations of good time credit. Chief......
-
United States v. Marchese
...nature of writ of error coram nobis for attacking the judgment and sentence under which a prisoner is incarcerated." Costner v. United States, 180 F.2d 892 (4th Cir. 1960). We thus hold in two respects the relief granted was VII — The Limits to Relief That May Be Granted in § 2255 Proceedin......
-
Sobell v. Attorney General of US, Dept. of Justice, 17349.
...180 F.2d 510, 514, 20 A.L.R.2d 965 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 340 U.S. 897, 71 S.Ct. 234, 95 L. Ed. 650 (1950), and Costner v. United States, 180 F.2d 892 (4th Cir. 1950). In view of our decision on this issue we need not consider whether the Administrative Procedure Act would also supply ju......
-
Gomori v. Arnold
...295 F.2d 458, 459 (9th Cir. 1961); Freeman v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 254 F.2d 352, 353-54 (1958); Costner v. United States, 180 F.2d 892 (4th Cir. 1950); 6 cf. United States ex rel. Marrero v. Warden, 483 F.2d 656, 660-61 (3d Cir. 1973), reversed on other grounds, 417 U.S. 653,......