Cotter v. California, 38
| Decision Date | 13 March 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 38,M,38 |
| Parties | William Earl COTTER, Jr. v. CALIFORNIA. isc |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
William Earl Cotter, pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Gordon Ringer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824.
Mr. Justice STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S., at 42, 87 S.Ct., at 837.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Hinds
...see also People v. Cotter (1965) 63 Cal.2d 386, 46 Cal.Rptr. 622, 405 P.2d 862 [vacated on another ground in Cotter v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 274, 87 S.Ct. 1035, 18 L.Ed.2d 43], applying the exception where the defendant gave seven statements, four of which were admissible, and three of......
-
Cameron, In re
...of the latter. (People v. Cotter (1965) 63 Cal.2d 386, 398, 46 Cal.Rptr. 622, 405 P.2d 862, vacated on other grounds (1967) 386 U.S. 274, 87 S.Ct. 1035, 18 L.Ed.2d 43; People v. Jacobson (1965) 63 Cal.2d 319, 329--331, 46 Cal.Rptr. 515, 405 P.2d 555.) We need not decide whether this excepti......
-
People v. Turner
...v. Cotter (1965) 63 Cal.2d 386, 395, 46 Cal.Rptr. 622, 405 P.2d 862, vacated on other grounds sub. nom. Cotter v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 274, 87 S.Ct. 1035, 18 L.Ed.2d 43, app. dism. by consent June 14, 1967; People v. Sanchez, supra, 65 Cal.2d 814, 824, 56 Cal.Rptr. 648, 423 P.2d After......
-
People v. Terry
...59 Cal.Rptr. 851, 429 P.2d 171); see also People v. Cotter, 63 Cal.2d 386, 393, 46 Cal.Rptr. 622, 405 P.2d 862, vacated, 386 U.S. 274, 87 S.Ct. 1035, 18 L.Ed.2d 43; People v. Pike, 239 Cal.App.2d 237, 242, 48 Cal.Rptr. It should also be mentioned that Terry Did not object at trial, on poiso......