Cottle v. Union Pac. R. Co.
Citation | 201 F. 39 |
Decision Date | 19 September 1912 |
Docket Number | 3,565. |
Parties | COTTLE, County Treasurer, et al. v. UNION PAC. R. CO. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit) |
Walter B. Dunton, of Green River, Wyo., and D.A. Reavill, of Rock Springs, Wyo. (N. E. Corthell, of Laramie, Wyo., on the brief), for appellants.
John W Lacey, of Cheyenne, Wyo. (Herbert V. Lacey, of Cheyenne Wyo., on the brief), for appellee.
Before ADAMS and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and REED, District Judge.
The Union Pacific Railroad extends through Sweetwater county Wyo., and the company owns a large amount of land in that county. The entire levy upon its property in the county for 1909 was $70,813.64. Of this it paid $62,576.48, and brought this suit against the county treasurer and ex officio county collector and the board of county commissioners to perpetually enjoin the collection of the balance of $8,237.16. A decree was rendered for the company and the treasurer, collector, and the board of county commissioners appeal. The taxes sought to be enjoined are of two classes First, a levy for bond redemption purposes; second, a levy for general county, school, and library purposes.
As all the statutes of Wyoming here material have been carried into the Complied Statutes of Wyoming for 1910, references will be made thereto. The county of Sweetwater is a municipal corporation.
'On the first Monday of September of each year, the board of county commissioners shall, by an order to be entered of record among their proceedings, levy the requisite taxes for the year, and the same may be levied any time prior to the first Monday of September, if the statement and notice required by section 2340 has been received from the auditor. ' Compiled Statutes of Wyoming, Sec. 2343.
The statement and notice required by section 2340 of the Compiled Statutes having been received on August 31, 1909, the board levied 6/10 of a mill for bond redemption purposes and 3 1/2 mills for general county, 1 3/10 mill for school and 13/100 of a mill for library, a total of 4 93/100. Subsequently, and after the first Monday in September, the board changed 24/100 of a mill from the general fund to the bond levy. There is doubt about its power to make such change after the first Monday in September. Standard Coal Co. v. Independent District of Angus, 73 Iowa, 304, 34 N.W. 870. This resolution was, however, subsequently rescinded, and, if the board had power to pass it, it undoubtedly had power to rescind it. With limitations not necessary to set out in detail, the county board was authorized to levy for general county expenses, including the school tax, not exceeding 12 mills, for schools not more than 3 mills, and for library not more than 1/2 mill. At the time the bonded debt of Sweetwater county was contracted the following law was in force:
* * * '
Before the levy of 1909 the following law had been enacted:
In passing to the consideration of the bond redemption levy, attention is called to the fact that, being unable to limit the taxes for the payment of bonds below that authorized at the time they were issued if the then authorized limit was needed for their payment, it was expressly provided in section 2342 that the above section 2341 shall in no way limit the amount of any levy necessary to be made for the purpose of paying any bonded debt. Under section 1125 separate levies had been made for the bond redemption fund and its bond interest fund. The principal of the bonded debt of the county was $20,900, the last of which became due November 3, 1911. The interest on these bonds and the other interest owed by the county on bonds amounted to $1,868. The county then had on hand in its bond interest fund $3,637.89, so that the money collected for interest in prior years exceeded the amount necessary to pay the interest by $1,769.89. The amount then in the bond redemption fund was $10,095.30. If an excessive interest fund had been collected in prior years, it should have been attacked before collection, and we do not find that there was any authority to compel funds collected for interest to be used in payment of principal.
The assessed value of Sweetwater county for 1909 was $18,981,753, and from this was deducted as improperly assessed $1,126,551, leaving the net amount $17,855,202. Of this amount $2,743,841 was upon what are known as migratory sheep; that is, sheep that graze in one county part of the year and in others the balance. The net assessment after all corrections and deducting migratory sheep was $15,111,361.
'Revised Statutes of Wyoming 1910.
It thus appears that the law, while providing for levying upon these sheep for various purposes, provided the whole amount left to the county should be covered into the general fund instead of distributed. This left for actual appropriation to bond redemptions from the new levy only 6/10 of a mill on $15,111,361 or $9,066.81. There was to be paid upon the principal of the bonded debt above the amount of the sinking fund $10,804.70, so the amount realized from the taxes, if all were collected, would be $1,737.89, less than the amount due. If the entire interest fund was applied to bond redemptions, the levy would produce $32 too much. This would be about 1/500 of a mill in excess of the amount required. The law cares not about very trifling matters.
It is contended that as $1,000 of the bonded debt did not mature until March 1, 1911, and $5,300 not until November 3, 1911, a tax levy in 1910 would have been in ample time to have met these obligations. The statute required the levy to be made at least one year before the bonds became due, and in time to provide means for their payment. There are but two limitations as to time of this levy. First, it shall be made at least one year before the bonds become due; and, second, it shall be made in time to provide means for their payment. The second provision clearly contemplates that it may be necessary to levy more than a year before the maturity of the bonds. Under the law taxes become due and payable after the third Monday in September, and become delinquent on December 31st of each year. It does not appear how soon they are usually collected by distress and sale if not voluntarily paid. In any event, it was for the county board to determine whether a 1910 levy would actually be paid in time to meet these bonds at maturity, and it determined that such levy could not be relied on.
The levy for bond redemption purposes was valid. It is claimed that in applying section 2341 of the Wyoming Statutes migratory stock should not be considered. In this we do not concur. Taxes levied upon such stock and turned over to other counties may be regarded as collected as trustee or agent for the other county, but money from this source actually collected and retained by the county is as much a part of its revenues as any other taxes.
The whole...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Parsons v. Detroit & Canada Tunnel Co.
...of Cincinnati Southern Ry. v. Guenther (C.C.) 19 F. 395; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Bosworth (D.C.) 230 F. 191; Cottle v. Union Pac. R. Co. (C.C.A.) 201 F. 39; Chicago & Northwestern R. Co. v. Eveland (C.C.A.) 13 F.(2d) 442; Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. Lewis (D.C.) 17 F.(2d) 167; Nort......
-
San Juan Trading Co. v. Sancho
...the authorized limits or at a discriminatory valuation; only the illegal or discriminatory excess is invalidated. Cottle v. Union Pacific R. Co., 8 Cir., 1912, 201 F. 39; Citizens' National Bank v. Board of Commissioners, 1910, 83 Kan. 376, 111 P. 496; Fairley v. Duluth, 1921, 150 Minn. 374......
-
City of Detroit v. Detroit & Canada Tunnel Co.
...207 U. S. 20, 37, 28 S.Ct. 7, 52 L.Ed. 78, 12 Ann. Cas. 757; Taylor v. Louisville & N. R. Co., supra, 88 F. 350, 369; Cottle v. Union Pac. R. Co., 201 F. 39, 43 (C.C.A.8); and Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. Lewis, supra, 17 F.(2d) 167, It follows from what has been said that the decree, in so ......
-
People v. Texas Co.
......925; U.S. Trust Co. v. New Mexico, 183. U.S. 535, 22 S.Ct. 172, 46 L.Ed. 315; Cottle v. Union P. R. Co. (C.C.A. 8th Cir.) 201 F. 39. . . 13. It. is claimed that the ......