Coulter v. Coulter

Decision Date01 December 1913
Citation161 S.W. 281,175 Mo.App. 1
PartiesFAE COULTER, Respondent, v. GUSSIE J. COULTER, Appellant
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

Appeal from Linn Circuit Court.--Hon. Fred Lamb, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Judgment affirmed.

A. W Mullins for appellant.

E. B Fields for respondent.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

This is an action under section 8295, Revised Statutes 1909, which provides that "when the husband, without good cause, shall abandon his wife, and refuse or neglect to maintain and provide for her, the circuit court, on her petition for that purpose, shall order and adjudge such support and maintenance to be provided and paid by the husband for the wife and her children, or any of them, by that marriage, out of his property, and for such time as the nature of the case and the circumstances of the parties shall require," etc.

The petition alleges that the parties were married July 2, 1911, in this State and lived together as husband and wife until March 17, 1912; "that during all that time plaintiff faithfully demeaned herself and discharged all her duties as the wife of defendant and at all times treated him with kindness and affection . . . that defendant wholly disregarding his duties as the husband of plaintiff did, on or about the 17th day of March, 1912, abandon plaintiff and has ever since refused, failed and neglected to provide for her . . . that there has been born of the marriage aforesaid one child, now of tender years . . . a girl of the age of sixteen months." The prayer is for an order "that defendant pay to her for her support and maintenance of herself and child the sum of twenty-five dollars monthly and that defendant be compelled to give security for such maintenance and for such other and further relief as to the court shall seem meet and just."

The answer, in substance, denies the charge of abandonment and pleads that plaintiff deserted defendant without just cause or excuse. A jury was waived and the court, after hearing the evidence, adjudged the issues in favor of plaintiff and allowed her maintenance in the sum of ten dollars per month, commencing July 1, 1913. Defendant filed motions for a new trial and in arrest which were overruled and defendant appealed.

At the time of their marriage, which occurred July 2, 1911, both parties were nineteen years of age. The defendant was the adopted child of Diana Coulter, an aged widow, who owned and resided upon a well-improved farm of 240 acres in Linn county. Defendant lived on the farm with her and had no other means of support than that which she provided. Plaintiff lived with her parents in Browning but had a married sister living near Mrs. Coulter whom she often visited. She received the attentions of defendant at her sister's home and an intimacy ensued under circumstances not creditable to her sister and brother-in-law. A child was born to the young couple November 27, 1911, less than five months after their marriage. Mrs. Coulter opposed the marriage but was persuaded by her son to give her written consent to enable him to obtain a license. Plaintiff knew that her husband was without means or ability to support her without the aid of his foster mother and before the marriage expressed herself as willing to go with him and abide in his mother's house. They went there two days after the marriage and were kindly received. Mrs. Coulter offered to turn over the management of the farm to them, giving them all they could make out of it and stipulating only for her own support. Plaintiff lived there eleven days under this arrangement and then returned to the home of her parents where she has since resided.

It appears from the testimony of plaintiff that defendant knew she was returning to her parents with the intention of remaining with them until he could provide a different home for her. Her objection to the home he had provided was that his mother would not allow any of her family to visit her there except her mother.

After the separation, defendant twice besought her to live with him but she refused on the ground that she could not live in harmony with his mother. She coupled her refusals with an offer to live with him if he would find her another home. The separation continued until March, 1912, when the parties lived as husband and wife for two days at the home of her parents. According to the testimony of plaintiff and of her mother, they then talked over their affairs and reached an agreement that plaintiff and their child should remain with her parents; that defendant would return to his foster mother and live with her until her death when they would reunite and live on the farm he would inherit from her. In the meantime he was to help support plaintiff and the child. The parties then separated again, defendant returning to his mother, but he did not contribute anything to the support of his wife and child and in the following October, commenced a suit for divorce against her on the ground of desertion. She employed counsel who filed an answer in which it was alleged that "she returned to her father's home, there to remain until such time as he, plaintiff, would provide her a home."

Afterward defendant dismissed the suit and went to Oklahoma to live and under date of March 5, 1913, he wrote his wife an affectionate letter in which he said "I want you to come out here and live with me. . . . I know we can live together. . . . Don't tell anyone where you are going for I don't want Ma to know we are living together or she won't give me anything. She don't know I am writing to you. If she did she would just rear. You come out here and we will live out here until we can do better. I wrote home and told them to sell everything I had and send me the money. I am going to put it in the gold mine. Bob says when they get started it will pay a dollar a day to every hundred. If it does I wont work much. . . . How is your mother? Tell her hello for me and Ruth, too (referring to the baby). I want to hear from you so badly I can hardly wait."

Plaintiff did not answer that letter but she did answer a second letter of the same tenor. She expressed a willingness to go to Oklahoma and live with defendant if he would send her money to defray the expenses of the trip and to pay the lawyer she had employed to defend the divorce suit. De...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT