Countrymark Co-Op. v. Hammes
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
| Citation | Countrymark Co-Op. v. Hammes, 898 N.E.2d 1230 (Ind. 2008) |
| Decision Date | 04 December 2008 |
| Parties | COUNTRYMARK CO-OP. v. HAMMES. |
Transfer denied. All Justices concur.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
Munster Med. Research Found., Inc. v. Hintz
...on that designated evidence in support of her argument in opposition to summary judgment.1 See, e.g. , Countrymark Coop. Inc. v. Hammes , 892 N.E.2d 683, 690 n.2 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (holding that party opposing summary judgment could rely on entire deposition where movant "designated the e......
-
Mendez v. Starbucks Corp. & Crossings at Hobart-I
...by a standard of the objective reasonable person-one best applied by a jury after hearing all of the evidence." Id. (quoting Countrymark Coop., 892 N.E.2d at 688). 17] Regarding snow and ice removal, a possessor of land has "a duty to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances to main......