Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Gress
| Decision Date | 01 December 2009 |
| Docket Number | 2008-09808 |
| Citation | 68 A.D.3d 709,888 N.Y.S.2d 914,2009 NY Slip Op 8989 |
| Parties | COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., Appellant, v. ANTHONY GRESS, Respondent, et al., Defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Anthony Gress which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3) on the ground that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring this action. In order to commence a foreclosure action, the plaintiff must have a legal or equitable interest in the subject mortgage (see Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Marchione, ___ AD3d ___, 2009 NY Slip Op 07624 [2d Dept 2009]; Katz v East-Ville Realty Co., 249 AD2d 243 [1998]; Kluge v Fugazy, 145 AD2d 537, 538 [1988]). "Where the plaintiff is the assignee of the mortgage and the underlying note at the time the foreclosure action was commenced, the plaintiff has standing to maintain the action" (Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Youkelsone, 303 AD2d 546, 546-547 [2003]; see Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Marchione, ___ AD3d ___, 2009 NY Slip Op 07624 [2009]; First Trust Natl. Assn. v Meisels, 234 AD2d 414 [1996]). Here, it is undisputed that the subject mortgage was not assigned to the plaintiff until July 5, 2007, more than five months after the commencement of this action on January 22, 2007. Furthermore, although the July 5, 2007 assignment recited that it was effective retroactive to August 1, 2006, "a retroactive assignment cannot be used to confer standing upon the assignee in a foreclosure action commenced prior to the execution of the assignment" (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Marchione, ___ AD3d ___, 2009 NY Slip Op 07624, *3 [2009]; see LaSalle Bank Natl. Assn. v Ahearn, 59 AD3d 911, 912 [2009]).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Torres
...rule is that mortgage note assignments must be effective prospectively, rather than retroactively (see Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Gress, 68 A.D.3d 709, 888 N.Y.S.2d 914 [2d Dept 2009] ) and they must be authored by entities having the requisite interests or authority to make such assig......
-
Gomez–Jimenez v. New York Law Sch.
... ... CMMF, LLC v. J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgt. Inc., 78 A.D.3d 562, 565, 915 N.Y.S.2d 2 (1st Dept 2010) ( ... numerous consequential costs such as interest on loans, books, traveling and housing expenses. Opposition ... ...
-
FTBK Investor II LLC v. Genesis Holding LLC
...and note to JPMorgan Chase until the assignment, by its terms, was executed October 3, 2012. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Gress, 68 A.D.3d 709, 710, 888 N.Y.S.2d 914 (2d Dep't 2009) ; LaSalle Bank Natl. Assn. v. Ahearn, 59 A.D.3d 911, 912, 875 N.Y.S.2d 595 (3d Dep't 2009). Absent evidenc......
-
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Arthur
...standing (see, Peak Fin. Partners, Inc. v. Brook, 119 AD3d 539, 987 N.Y.S.2d 916 [2d Dept 2014] ; cf., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Gress, 68 AD3d 709, 888 N.Y.S.2d 914 [2d Dept 2009] ). Mrs. Arthur, therefore, failed to establish the merit of the standing defense in the answer, or the m......