County of Bergen v. Dole
Decision Date | 10 October 1985 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 82-4065. |
Citation | 620 F. Supp. 1009 |
Parties | The COUNTY OF BERGEN; the Borough of Franklin Lakes; the Township of Montville; the Franklin Lakes Homeowners Committee Against I-287; the New Jersey Citizens Coalition To Stop I-287; and the Passaic River Coalition, Plaintiffs, v. Elizabeth Hanford DOLE, as the Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation; the United States Department of Transportation; Ray Barnhart, as the Federal Highway Administrator; John G. Bestgen, Jr., as the Regional Administrator of Region 1 of the Federal Highway Administration; John J. Kessler, Jr., as the Division Administrator of the New Jersey Division of the Federal Highway Administration; the Federal Highway Administration; James G. Watt, as the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; the United States Department of the Interior; Lee Verstandig, as the Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency; Jacqueline E. Schafer, as Administrator of Region 2 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency; the United States Environmental Protection Agency; John P. Sheridan, Jr., as the Commissioner of Transportation of the New Jersey Department of Transportation, and the New Jersey Department of Transportation, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
David Paget, New York City, for all plaintiffs.
William T. Smith, Franklin Lakes, N.J., for Franklin Lakes.
Priscilla Triolo, Hackensack, N.J., for Franklin Lakes Homeowners Committee Against I-287 and New Jersey Citizens Coalition to Stop I-287.
Valerie F. Mauceri, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., for U.S. Dept. of Transp., Federal Highway Admin., U.S. E.P.A., and U.S. Dept. of Interior.
Michael R. Dressler, Hackensack, N.J., Bergen County Counsel.
Lawrence K. Eismeier, Boonton, N.J., for Montville.
Alfred Porro, Lyndhurst, N.J., for Passaic River Coalition.
John J. Maiorana, Deputy Atty. Gen., Div. of Law, Trenton, N.J., for N.J. Dept. of Transp.
Interstate 287 (hereinafter "I-287") was designated as part of the original interstate highway system in 1956.It was never completed.The plaintiffs herein seek to enjoin the construction of the remaining 20.6 mile stretch from the terminus of United States Route 202 in Montville Township, Morris County, New Jersey to the New York State Thruway in Suffern, New York.The Administrative Record, affidavits, briefs and correspondence submitted to the court in this vigorously litigated action to bar the planned construction are themselves sufficient to pave the remaining twenty miles.The Assistant United States Attorney representing the federal defendants to this action has stated that "this case holds the record in the U.S. Attorney's Office, both criminal and civil, for the highest xeroxing bill and the most amount of paper ever submitted to the U.S. District Court, at least of recent vintage, in the last 15 years."SeeTranscript of hearing, February 14, 1984at 17.Taken literally or metaphorically, this statement confirms this court's impression that the gargantuan 46 volume Administrative Record in the instant litigation has not often been surpassed.
The plaintiffs herein are the County of Bergen, the Borough of Franklin Lakes (Bergen County), the Township of Montville (Morris County), Franklin Lakes Homeowners Committee Against I-287, New Jersey Citizens Coalition to Stop I-287 and the Passaic River Coalition.Three other plaintiffs, the Township of Pequannock, the Borough of Pompton Lakes and the Township of Mahwah have withdrawn from this litigation by consent orders filed with this court.
The defendants are a variety of individuals and agencies of the state and federal governments.The so-called "federal defendants" are as follows: the United States Department of Transportation(hereinafter "USDOT"), Elizabeth Hanford Dole in her capacity as Secretary of USDOT, the Federal Highway Administration (hereinafter "FHWA")(an administration within USDOT), Ray Barnhart in his capacity as Administrator of FHWA, John G. Bestgen, Jr. in his capacity as Regional Administrator of Region 1 of FHWA, John Kessler, Jr. in his capacity as Division Administrator of the New Jersey Division of FHWA, the United States Department of the Interior(hereinafter "DOI"), James G. Watt in his capacity as former Secretary of DOI,1 the Environmental Protection Agency(hereinafter EPA), Lee Verstandig in his capacity as the Acting Administrator of EPA2, and Jacqueline E. Schafer in her capacity as the Administrator of Region 2 of EPA.The so-called "state defendants" are the New Jersey Department of Transportation(hereinafter "NJDOT") and John P. Sheridan, Jr. in his capacity as the Commissioner of NJDOT.
Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief.They allege that the administrative process resulting in the approval of the I-287 highway project violated the Department of Transportation Act of 1966as amended, 49 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.(hereinafter cited as "DOTA"); the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.(hereinafter cited as "NEPA") and the regulations promulgated thereunder; the Federal Aid Highway Actas amended, 23 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.(hereinafter cited as "FAHA"), and the regulations promulgated thereunder; and Policy and Procedure Memorandum 20-8 (hereinafter cited as "PPM 20-8") superseded in...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
...665 (9th Cir.1998) (listing instances in which a court may review materials outside the administrative record); Bergen County v. Dole, 620 F.Supp. 1009, 1016-17 (D.N.J.1985) (discussing propriety of review of materials outside the administrative record). In particular, in NEPA cases, "a pri......
-
Public Interest Research Group v. FEDERAL HY. ADMIN., Civ.A. No. 94-4292 (AJL).
...but reaching a different conclusion, a litigant could create a controversy necessitating an EIS or EA. Id. See also County of Bergen v. Dole, 620 F.Supp. 1009 (D.N.J.1985), aff'd 800 F.2d 1130 (3d Cir.1986). In the instant matter, Plaintiffs have done nothing more than submit the Replogle A......
-
Raymond Proffitt Found v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng.
...Wildlife Service and the state agency, rather it requires that these views "be given serious consideration." See County of Bergen v. Dole, 620 F.Supp. 1009, 1063 (D.N.J.1985) (internal citations omitted). FWCA applies to both "new project construction" as well as "modification or supplement......
-
State Of N.J. v. United States Army Corp.S Of Eng'rs
...Environ. Defense Fund, Inc. v. Froehlke, 473 F.2d 346, 356 (8th Cir.1972); Sierra Club, 935 F. Supp. at 1579; Bergen Cnty. v. Dole, 620 F. Supp. 1009, 1064 (D.N.J. 1985). The Court has already decided above that the Corps complied with NEPA. Moreover, DRN's claims that the Corps failed to g......
-
Essential fish habitat: does calling it essential make it so?
...(E.D. Mo. 1988) ("[A]n agency's compliance with NEPA automatically satisfies the requirements of the FWCA."); County of Bergen v. Dole, 620 F. Supp. 1009, 1064 (D.N.J. 1985) (relying on Eighth Circuit precedent that compliance with NEPA automatically satisfies the factors required by the FW......