County of Daviess v. Dickinson
Decision Date | 12 April 1886 |
Citation | 6 S.Ct. 897,29 L.Ed. 1026,117 U.S. 657 |
Parties | COUNTY OF DAVIESS v. DICKINSON. Filed |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
This was an action brought April 3, 1879, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kentucky, by Dickinson against the county of Daviess, on bonds and coupons alleged to have been issued under the statute of Kentucky of February 27, 1867, (chapter 1505,) incorporating the Owensboro & Russellville Railroad Company, the material provisions of which were as follows: By section 1, five persons named, in Daviess county, and certain other persons named, in each of four other counties, are 'appointed commissioners, under the direction of whom, or any three of whom, in each of said counties, subscription may be received to the capital stock of the Owensboro & Russellville Railroad Company hereby incorporated.' By section 2, 'the capital stock of said Owensboro & Russellville Railroad Company shall be one million dollars, in shares of twenty-five dollars each.' By section 19, 'the county courts of Daviess' and those four other counties
At the trial the following facts were admitted: At March term, 1867, of the Daviess county court, upon the suggestion of the five commissioners named in the charter of the railroad company, that court ordered to be submitted to the voters of the county, on the third Monday in April, 1867, this proposition: 'Shall or shall not the county court of Daviess county subscribe ten thousand shares, being the sum of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars, to the capital stock of said Owensboro & Russellville Railroad Company?' At April term, 1868, GEORGE W. TRIPLETT, presiding judge, and a majority of the justices of the peace of the county being present, the county court, upon motion, of EDWARD C. BERRY, one of those justices, adopted the following order: 'In obedience to the will of the majority of the voters and tax-payers of this county, as expressed and recorded in the poll-book at the election held on the fifteenth day of April, 1867, it is now ordered that this court do subscribe two hundred and fifty thousand dollars to the capital stock of the Owensboro & Russellville Railroad Company, and GEORGE W. TRIPLETT, presiding judge of this court, is ordered and directed to make said subscription of said stock in manner and ferm as prescribed by the charter incorporating said company.'
At July term, 1868, of the county court,
GEORGE W. TRIPLETT, the presiding judge, and Thomas C. Jones, the clerk of the county court, claiming to act under the authority of this order, signed as such judge and clerk bonds of the county, and under the seal of the county court, as follows:
Bonds payable in five years, to the amount of. $ 51,250
Bonds payable in ten years, to the amount of. 65,200
Bonds payable in fifteen years, to the amount of. 76,500
Bonds payable in twenty years, to the amount of. 127,500
------------
$320,450 The bonds of each class had distinct letters, and were numbered in a series; and each bond, omitting the letter and number, the sum and time of payment, and the coupons...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
I IS Ljo State v. County Court Op Wirt County.
...c. 78; 101 Pa. St. 284; 1 Dill. Man. Corp. (4th Ed.) 522-524, 529; 106 U. S. 487; 133 U. S. 527; 13 Bush 101; 3 Kan. 104; 115 U. S. 384; 117 U. S. 657; Const. (1863) Art. IV. s. 36; Acts 1864, c. 32; Acts 1866, c. 122; 102 U. S. 625; 111 U. S. 400; 127 U. S. 160; 121 U. S. 165; Id. 172; Act......
-
First Nat. Bank v. Obion County
...Wallace v. Tipton County, 3 Shan. Cas. 542; Marsh v. Fulton County, 77 U. S. 673, 683, 684, 19 L. Ed. 1040; Daviess County v. Dickinson, 117 U. S. 657, 6 S. Ct. 897, 29 L. Ed. 1026; Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U. S. 425, 453, 454, 6 S. Ct. 1121, 30 L. Ed. 178; Railway & Navigation Co. v. H......
-
Scott County, Ark. v. Advance-Rumley Thresher Co.
... ... 601, 25 L.Ed. 1070 ... It has ... been held that under some circumstances a corporation can ... deny its power to act. Daviess County v. Dickinson, ... 117 U.S. 657, 6 Sup.Ct. 897, 29 L.Ed. 1026; Anthony v ... County of Jasper, 101 U.S. 693, 25 L.Ed. 1005; ... Daniels ... ...
-
City of Parkersburg v. Baltimore & O.R. Co.
... ... right of exemption by estoppel. Marsh v. Fulton ... County, 10 Wall. 676, 19 L.Ed. 1040; Loan ... Association v. Topeka, 20 Wall. 655, 22 L.Ed. 455; ... Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U.S. 487, 501, 1 Sup.Ct ... 442, 27 L.Ed. 238; Daviess County v. Dickinson, 117 ... U.S. 657, 6 Sup.Ct. 897, 29 L.Ed. 1026; Bloomfield v ... Charter ... ...