Coury v. Safe Auto Sales, Inc.
Decision Date | 23 November 1970 |
Citation | 35 A.D.2d 829,316 N.Y.S.2d 860 |
Parties | Alexander COURY et al., Respondents, v. SAFE AUTO SALES, INC., et al., Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Fuchsberg & Fuchsberg, New York City, for plaintiffs-respondents; Edwin N. Weidman, Irving Lemov, New York City, of counsel.
Hampton, Dietel & Heneghan, New York City, for defendant-appellant, Safe Auto Sales, Inc.; Howard J. McGratty, Brooklyn, Attorney for defendant-appellant, Abraham Zager, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Zager, Deceased; William F. McNulty, New York City, of counsel.
Before CHRIST, P.J. and RABIN, HOPKINS, MUNDER and MARTUSCELLO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 20, 1970, in favor of plaintiffs upon a jury verdict (the trial court directed a verdict as to the issues of liability in favor of plaintiffs).
Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event.The questions of fact have not been considered.
The testimony of only one witness is contained in the record on appeal.His testimony that the vehicle in which the injured plaintiff was a passenger-guest went into a skid back and forth, crossed over onto the wrong side of the road and collided with a pickup truck going in the opposite direction was not per se sufficient to...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
- Cinelli v. Radcliffe
-
Coury v. Safe Auto Sales, Inc.
...plaintiff was injured. We previously reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered on a directed verdict (Coury v. Safe Auto Sales, 35 A.D.2d 829, 316 N.Y.S.2d 860), on the ground that, while they had made out a prima facie case, the question of liability was one for the jury to pass O......
-
Coury v. Safe Auto Sales, Inc.
...rested without presenting any evidence. The trial court directed a verdict for infant plaintiff, and the Appellate Division, 35 A.D.2d 829, 316 N.Y.S.2d 860, unanimously reversed and granted a new trial. 1 At the second trial, and upon the same evidence, the jury returned a verdict in favor......
-
Barrett v. Twersky
... ... -appellants, Bernard Tuchman and Artistic Reproductions, Inc.; Harold L. Cowin, Joseph D. Ahearn, Brooklyn, of counsel ... ...