CoVantage Credit Union v. Stangel (In re Stangel)
| Decision Date | 10 October 2018 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 17-20394-beh,Adv. Case No. 17-02132 |
| Parties | In the MATTER OF: Danielle Marie STANGEL, Debtor. CoVantage Credit Union, Plaintiff, v. Danielle Marie Stangel, Defendant. |
| Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin |
593 B.R. 607
In the MATTER OF: Danielle Marie STANGEL, Debtor.
CoVantage Credit Union, Plaintiff,
v.
Danielle Marie Stangel, Defendant.
Case No. 17-20394-beh
Adv. Case No. 17-02132
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin.
Signed October 10, 2018
Justin J. Bates, Bates Legal Group, Wausau, WI, for Plaintiff
Danielle Marie Stangel, Shawano, WI, pro se
DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Beth E. Hanan, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Plaintiff CoVantage Credit Union filed a complaint seeking to except from discharge a debt resulting from the debtor's presentation of bad checks, relying on both 11 U.S.C §§ 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(2)(B). The debtor did not respond to the complaint, so CoVantage moved for default judgment. Realizing that its two legal theories were inconsistent and mutually exclusive, CoVantage pursued judgment on only the claim under section 523(a)(2)(A). The Court held two prove-up hearings on the motion, at which counsel for CoVantage submitted supporting evidence.
After considering counsel's submissions and arguments, and the record in this case, the Court will grant the motion. Because the Court lacks sufficient evidence to determine the appropriate amount of the nondischargeable debt in one aspect, the Court will defer entering an order for judgment until CoVantage supplements the record with additional information.
JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and the Eastern District of Wisconsin's July 16, 1984, order of reference. CoVantage's request for a determination of the nondischargeability of its debt is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). CoVantage's request for the entry of a money judgment under Wisconsin state law is non-core, but the debtor's failure to appear and defend against the claim, despite proper service of the summons and complaint, constitutes knowing and voluntary consent to the Court's final adjudication of that request. See Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif , ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1932, 191 L.Ed.2d 911 (2015) ; Kravitz v. Deacons (In re Advance Watch Co., Ltd.) , 587 B.R. 598, 602 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018) ; Campbell v. Carruthers (In re Campbell) , 553 B.R. 448, 452–53 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2016).
FACTS
CoVantage alleges that, between November 14 and November 15, 2016, the debtor-defendant Danielle Stangel made out four checks to herself, totaling $2,450, drawn on an Associated Bank account in her name. See CM-ECF Doc. No. 1, ¶¶ 5–8 and Exs. A–D. The debtor deposited these checks with CoVantage and then withdrew (most of) the funds shortly thereafter. Id. ¶ 9. The checks later were returned for
insufficient funds. Id. ¶¶ 5–9. In late November 2016, CoVantage sent the debtor a demand letter for repayment of the overdrawn funds, in the amount of $2,405.25. Id. ¶ 10. The debtor never repaid, and the debt remains outstanding. Id.
At the prove-up hearings on CoVantage's motion for default judgment, CoVantage presented the affidavit of Kami Price, an agent of CoVantage. CM-ECF Doc. No. 18. The affidavit attaches four copies of returned checks from an Associated Bank account in Ms. Stangel's name, made out to Ms. Stangel, in amounts ranging from $250 to $850, issued between November 14 and November 15, 2016 (also attached as exhibits to the complaint).
Ms. Price avers that the debtor presented the checks to CoVantage on the following dates and times:
Date/Time Presented Amount Disposition of funds
November 14, 2016 at 10:12 AM $850 $200 deposited
$650 cash given to debtor
November 14, 2016 at 11:13 AM $250 All $250 given to debtor
November 15, 2016 at 8:22 AM $850 All $850 given to debtor
Debtor also withdrew $150
November 15, 2016 at 2:06 PM $500 All $500 given to debtor1
CoVantage also presented the affidavit of Donna M. Woida, an employee of Associated Bank. CM-ECF Doc. No. 24. The affidavit attaches copies of financial records from Associated Bank, which show the following:
• An Associated Bank checking account was opened in Ms. Stangel's name around March 16, 2016, with a $3,000 deposit. Id. at 3.
• While open, the account had the following monthly ending balances (see id. at 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12):
Date Account Balance
April 10, 2016 $94.75
May 8, 2016 $19.83
June 8, 2016 -$501.61
July 10, 2016 -$363.94
August 8, 2016 $0
• The reason for the August 8 ending balance of $0 was that Associated Bank charged off $377.94 in principal and fees on August 5, essentially balancing out the account. Id. at 12. There has been no further activity in the account to date.
• The highest ending balance on any given date during the period the account was open was $2,380.13 on March 17, 2016. The balance fell below
[593 B.R. 611
$1,000 on March 21, and, aside from an April 12 balance of $1,012.99 due to a $1,000 deposit that day, it remained below $1,000 until the account was closed. See id. at 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13. The last date the account had a positive balance was June 16, 2016. Id. at 11.
• During the statement period of May 9 through June 8, 2016, the account incurred $217 in overdraft fees, and $35 in returned item fees. Id. at 9. During the statement period of June 9 through July 10, 2016, the account incurred $210 in overdraft fees, and $175 in returned item fees. Id. at 11. Two checks (for $325.92 and $35) also were returned during that period. During the statement period of July 11 through August 8, 2016, the account incurred $14 in overdraft fees, and $35 in returned item fees. Id. at 12.
• The debtor received what appear to be bi-weekly payroll deposits ("HEARTLAND EMPLOY DIR DEP") into her Associated Bank checking account in the following amounts on the following dates (see id. at 8 and 10):
Date Deposit Amount
May 18, 2016 $401.09
June 1, 2016 $727.61
June 15, 2016 $777.81
June 29, 2016 $597.68
• An Associated Bank savings account was opened in Ms. Stangel's name around March 16, 2016, with a $1,000 deposit. Id. at 17.
• While open, the account had the following monthly ending balances (see id. at 19, 20, 22, and 24):
Date Account Balance
March 31, 2019 $101.01
April 30, 2016 $1.01
May 31, 2016 -$3.99
June 30, 2016 -$8.99
July 31, 2016 $0
• The savings account was closed on July 1, 2016 (an entry for July 1, 2016 states "Account Closure"). Id. at 24.
The financial statements from Associated Bank are undated, and counsel for CoVantage did not know when/if the debtor received the statements, or when/if the debtor learned that her account(s) had been closed. The statements list the debtor's address as N6967 Lake Crest Ln, Shawano, WI.
In its complaint, CoVantage claims that the debtor's actions caused it "direct loss and damage in the amount of $2,405.25." CM-ECF Doc. No. 1, ¶ 20. Citing to
Wis. Stat. §§ 943.24 and 895.446, CoVantage seeks a money judgment of $7,500.90 as treble damages,2 plus all accrued interest cost and actual reasonable attorney fees. Id. ¶ 21.
The schedules and other statements the debtor filed in her main bankruptcy case establish the following:
• The debtor's bankruptcy attorney was paid (by someone else, on Ms. Stangel's behalf) on July 22, 2016. See Case No. 17-20394-beh, CM-ECF Doc. No. 1, at 44.
• As of her January 20, 2017 bankruptcy filing, the debtor had been employed for four months as a CNA at Golden Living, with monthly take-home pay of $746.92 (and gross pay of $821.17). Id. at 35–36.
• The debtor's average gross monthly income for the six months before she filed her bankruptcy (July through December 2016) was $533. Id. at 47–48.
• Her petition lists her address as N6967 Lakecrest Lane, Shawano, WI.
DISCUSSION
A defendant's default does not, standing alone, entitle the plaintiff to a default judgment. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), made applicable by Bankruptcy Rule 7055, grants the Court broad discretion to conduct hearings and receive evidence it deems proper before entering a default judgment. "Because of the impact of a nondischargeability action on the ‘fresh start’ arising from the entry of an order of discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a), bankruptcy courts are particularly reluctant to ‘rubber stamp’ motions for default judgments in adversary proceedings filed to determine dischargeability of indebtedness ...." MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Hostetter (In re Hostetter) , 320 B.R. 674, 679 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 2005). Additionally, "[u]pon default, the well-pled allegations of the complaint relating to liability are taken as true, but those relating to the amount of damages suffered ordinarily are not." Wehrs v. Wells , 688 F.3d 886, 892 (7th Cir. 2012). Damages must be proved "unless the amount claimed is liquidated or capable of ascertainment from definite figures contained in the documentary evidence or in detailed affidavits." United States v. Di Mucci , 879 F.2d 1488, 1497 (7th Cir. 1989). In deciding whether CoVantage is entitled to a default judgment, the Court must determine whether CoVantage has proven a prima...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Reid v. Wolf (In re Wolf)
...19, 2008) ; see also Fredonia Broad. Corp. v. RCA Corp. , 481 F.2d 781, 801 (5th Cir. 1973) ; In re Stangel , 593 B.R. 607, 609–10, 2018 WL 4945692, at *1 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. Oct. 10, 2018). These principles apply with equal weight even where a default judgment is sought as a discovery sancti......
-
Thunderbird Eng'g v. Am. Design, Inc.
...bankruptcy court interpreted Storey as conclusively resolving the issue of whether Wis.Stat. § 895.446(3) is discretionary or mandatory. In Stangel, the court analyzed Storey and two other Wisconsin cases (discussed below), and concluded, "[T]he case law is clear that exemplary damages unde......
-
Wiseman v. Milwaukee Radiologists Ltd. (In re Wiseman)
...A defendant's failure to answer, however, does not necessarily "entitle the plaintiff to a default judgment." In re Stangel , 593 B.R. 607, 612 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2018). A plaintiff must still "establish that the well-pleaded facts found in the complaint, if taken as true, amount to a legall......