Covey Run, LLC v. Wash. Capital, LLC
Decision Date | 11 July 2016 |
Docket Number | Civil Action No. 1:15-1997 (CKK) |
Citation | 196 F.Supp.3d 87 |
Parties | COVEY RUN, LLC, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON CAPITAL, LLC, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia |
Iris Figueroa Rosario, V, Eric L. Yaffe, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.
Dominic G. Vorv, The Vorv Firm, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Defendants.
Plaintiff Covey Run, LLC ("Covey Run" or "Plaintiff") brings this action alleging that Defendants Washington Capital, LLC ("Washington Capital"), Jemel Lyles, Melvin Sanders, and Steve Evans (collectively, the "Washington Defendants") perpetrated a fraudulent scheme that culminated in the alleged theft of $1.2 million from Covey Run. Covey Run alleges that Defendant Washington Capital breached its contract with Covey Run by accessing $1.2 million held in escrow without the prior written knowledge and consent of Covey Run. Covey Run further alleges that Defendants L. Gregory Loomar ("Loomar") and the Law Offices of L. Gregory Loomar P.A. ("Loomar, P.A."), (collectively, the "Loomar Defendants"), failed to meet their fiduciary duties as the escrow agent for the funds in question, and that Defendant Michael Blackwell ("Blackwell") negligently misrepresented to Covey Run that Defendant Washington Capital was a reputable private equity firm. In addition, Covey Run alleges a claim of fraud and a claim of conversion against the Washington Defendants.
Presently before the Court is the Loomar Defendants' [19] Amended Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (the "Motion to Dismiss"). Upon consideration of the pleadings,1 the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Court DENIES the Loomar Defendants' Amended Joint Motion to Dismiss.
For the purposes of the motion before the Court, the Court accepts as true the well-pleaded allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint. The Court does "not accept as true, however, the plaintiff's legal conclusions or inferences that are unsupported by the facts alleged." Ralls Corp. v. Comm. on Foreign Inv. in U.S. , 758 F.3d 296, 315 (D.C.Cir.2014). The Court reserves further additional presentation of the background, as necessary, for the discussion of the legal issues below.
As Plaintiff recounts in its Complaint, Covey Run is a Minnesota limited liability company established in 2010 to develop assisted living housing for seniors in Sheridan, Wyoming. Compl. ¶ 1. Seeking funding to purchase property for this purpose, a Covey Run representative met with Defendant Blackwell and another individual named Karen Baas. Id. ¶ 14. Representing that they were licensed brokers working on behalf of a reputable private equity firm known as Washington Capital, Blackwell and Baas introduced Covey Run to Washington Capital's main representative, Defendant Sanders. Id. ¶ 14. Washington Capital thereafter represented to Covey Run that it was a private equity firm created to assist companies in their lending needs and was associated with Lloyd Bancaire of Luxembourg, Standard Charter Bank of the United Kingdom, and Deutsche Bank of Germany. Id. ¶ 15. Washington Capital further represented that it could secure a $10 million loan from these banks to fund Covey Run's development project, which was anticipated to cost $12 million. Id. ¶ 16.
On or about May 8, 2014, Washington Capital drafted and presented a Letter of Commitment to Covey Run outlining the terms of the proposed Wyoming development project. Id. ¶ 20; see also LOC (Ex. 2 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-4] ). Executed by the parties shortly thereafter, the Letter of Commitment stated that Covey Run would invest $1.2 million in the project, and Washington Capital would invest $660,000. See LOC § 1 (Ex. 2 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-4], at 3). Under Section 2.2 of the Letter of Commitment, the parties agreed that the $1.2 million held in escrow would be "used first for the payments of the project['s] costs." See LOC § 2.2 (Ex. 2 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-4], at 6). Under Section 2.4, the parties appointed the Law Offices of L. Gregory Loomar, P.A. to serve as the escrow agent. See LOC § 2.4 (Ex. 2 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-4], at 7).
Thereafter, Washington Capital presented loan and financial information to Covey Run for it to sign. Pl.'s Compl. ¶ 24. In particular, Washington Capital presented a Loan Agreement and other documents concerning the $10 million loan. Id. Defendant Evans signed the Loan Agreement and other related documents on behalf of Washington Capital, and Defendant Sanders signed certain documents as managing member of Washington Capital. Id. ; see also Loan Agreement (Ex. 4 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-6] ).
On or about July 8, 2014, Covey Run and Washington Capital entered into "Addendum A," which was expressly incorporated into the Letter of Commitment. See Addendum at 2 . Addendum A contained a number of sections further delineating the scope of the Escrow Agent's duties and responsibilities. Specifically:
Consistent with the terms of the Letter of Commitment and Addendum A, Covey Run subsequently sent its $1.2 million in equity funds by wire transfer to a Wells Fargo Bank account named via two installments, one payment on July 18, 2014 in the amount of $850,000, and another on August 11, 2014 in the amount of $350,000. Pl.'s Compl. ¶¶ 21, 23.3 Loomar confirmed in a signed receipt that he had received the wire transfers for the equity money, and represented that he sent a copy of the receipt to Covey Run, located at 340 S. Hwy 10, St. Cloud, Minnesota, and to Washington Capital, located at 1050 Connecticut Ave., NW, 10th Floor, Washington, D.C. Id. ¶ 23; see also Equity Money Receipt (Ex. 3 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-5] ).
Additionally, on the same days that Covey Run transferred the money to the escrow account, Loomar transferred the money to Defendant Lyles. Pl.'s Compl. ¶ 37; see also Escrow Communication (Ex. 10 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-12], at 4). As to the wire transfer of $850,000 made on July 18, 2014, Loomar immediately disbursed approximately $847,000.00 to Washington Capital's bank account in Washington, D.C., while retaining approximately $2,900, which was transferred to his law firm's bank account. Id. ; see also Escrow Communication (Ex. 10 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-12], at 4). Similarly, as to the wire transfer Covey Run made on August 11, 2014, Loomar wire transferred the money to Washington Capital that same day, sending approximately $348,000 after retaining approximately $875.00 for his law firm. Id. ¶ 38; see also Escrow Communication (Ex. 10 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-12], at 6).
Loomar appeared to have issued the wire transfers pursuant to instructions received from Washington Capital, in an email from Defendant Lyles dated July 16, 2014 (which pre-dates the wire transfers). Id. ¶ 39; see also Escrow Communication (Ex. 10 to Pl.'s Complaint, ECF No. [1-12], at 10). The email sent by Lyles to Loomar stated simply, "Greg please send the $1,200,000.00, less your...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Covey Run, LLC v. Wash. Capital, LLC
...Opinion, which is incorporated by reference and made part of this Memorandum Opinion. See generally Covey Run, LLC v. Washington Capital, LLC , 196 F.Supp.3d 87 (D.D.C. 2016). After that Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order were issued, Plaintiff filed the now operative Amended Complai......