Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. News-Journal Corp.

Decision Date21 December 2007
Docket NumberNo. 06-16190.,06-16190.
Citation510 F.3d 1350
PartiesCOX ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. NEWS-JOURNAL CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee, Herbert M. Davidson, Jr., et al., Defendants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

Lesli N. Gaither, Peter Canfield, Dow Lohnes, PLLC, Atlanta, GA, Courtney K. Grimm, John A. DeVault, III, Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault & Pillans, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Cox Enterprises, Inc.

Michelle Milberg, Thomas R. Julin, Talbot D'Alemberte, Hunton & Williams, Miami, FL, for Amicus Curiae.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Before BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,* District Judge.

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-appellant News-Journal Corporation ("NJC") appeals the determination made by the district court of the "fair value" of stock held by plaintiff-appellee, Cox Enterprises, Inc. ("Cox"), pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 607.1436 (2003). Cox cross-appeals, arguing that, although the valuation method was proper, the district court ought also to have included compensation for past misconduct in its "fair value" calculation. Cox also challenges the district court's refusal to award prejudgment interest. We AFFIRM the district court's determination.

I. BACKGROUND

Cox is a privately held Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Atlanta, Georgia.1 It owns seventeen daily newspapers, including The Atlanta-Journal Constitution, Austin American-Statesman, Dayton Daily News, and Palm Beach Post. NJC is a closely held Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Daytona Beach, Florida. NJC publishes the Daytona Beach News-Journal ("News-Journal"), a daily newspaper circulated primarily in Volusia and Flagler Counties. NJC has one wholly owned subsidiary, Volusia Pennysaver, Inc. ("Pennysaver"), which publishes six local shopping guides.

NJC was organized in 1925 through the consolidation of two small Daytona Beach newspapers to form the News-Journal. NJC has one class of common stock of which 4,000 shares are outstanding. Members of the Davidson family purchased a controlling interest in NJC in 1927 and PMV, Inc., a closely held corporation controlled by the Estate of Herbert M. ("Tippen") Davidson, Jr., owns those 2,100, or 52.5%, of NJC's shares. Cox acquired the remainder of the NJC stock in 1969 and has maintained its 47.5% interest since that time.

When the case came before the district court, NJC's directors were Tippen Davidson, Marc Davidson, Julia Davidson Truilo, Robert Truilo, Georgia Kaney, Jonathan Kaney, Jr., and David Kendall. Tippen Davidson also served as the president and CEO of NJC until his death in January 2007. Tippen Davidson's grandfather, Julius, served as the News-Journal's publisher from 1927 until 1962, when he relinquished control of the paper to his son Herbert M. Davidson. Herbert published the paper until his death in 1985. Under Julius and Herbert's leadership, NJC also owned and operated a radio station, WNDB-FM, from 1944 to 1972.

Although Tippen Davidson enjoyed a brief career as a professional musician, he eventually returned to Daytona Beach to work as a reporter and city editor for the News-Journal. Upon his father's death, he became the paper's general manager and publisher. Tippen's wife, Josephine, has also worked as a reporter and editor at the News-Journal. Their two children, Marc Davidson and Julia Davidson Truilo, are currently members of the News-Journal staff and the NJC board of directors. Julia's husband, Robert Truilo, serves on the board of directors and as the News-Journal's business manager.

In his capacity as CEO of NJC, Tippen Davidson continued to pursue his interest in music and the performing arts. As early as 1966, he began to help create several non-profit organizations, including the Florida International Festival ("FIF"), Central Florida Cultural Endeavors ("CFCE"), Seaside Music Theater ("SMT"), and Lively Arts Center, Inc. ("LACI") (collectively "Cultural Entities"). SMT, in particular, has consistently depended on funding from NJC. After NJC pledged $1.8 million to SMT in 1993, NJC management developed a "spin-off strategy" according to which contributions to SMT would go down by $180,000 annually until they totaled no more than $500,000 per year. The strategy was never effectively implemented, and, in fact, in 1999, NJC's total contribution to SMT came to $1.4 million. By the following year, this figure had risen to $1.8 million — triple what it had been eight years before.

In 1996, NJC's directors organized LACI as a part of the SMT spin-off strategy. Tippen, Georgia Kaney, Marc Davidson, and Julia Truilo served as its original board of directors. Their goal was to build and operate an independent and upscale performing arts center for SMT, thereby enhancing the stature of SMT and increasing its revenue. The projected cost for the center was $29 million. NJC provided $13 million of this amount as part of a naming rights agreement.2

In the beginning, NJC treated its contributions to the Cultural Entities as charitable tax deductions. Over time, however, the donations began to exceed the maximum allowed for charitable deductions. Accordingly, in 1993, NJC began to classify its contributions as business expenses for the purpose of corporate promotion. The district court found these cultural expenditures to have been waste. NJC does not challenge that finding for the purposes of this appeal.

Cox first learned of the $13 million naming rights agreement on 10 March 2004. Unsatisfied with the explanations for this expenditure provided by NJC, Cox filed suit on 11 May 2004, alleging various acts of fraud, waste, and mismanagement. NJC then timely elected to purchase Cox's shares "at the `fair value' of the shares" pursuant to Florida law. Fla. Stat. § 607.1436(1).3 Because the parties were unable to come to any agreement, the district court held a bench trial to determine the "fair value" of Cox's shares. Id.

At trial, both sides presented expert testimony. Cox's expert, Owen D. Van Essen, is a partner in Dirks, Van Essen, & Murray, a firm specializing in the valuation of newspapers. Van Essen's firm has valued in excess of ten billion dollars worth of transactions in its twenty-five year history and more than fifty percent of the daily newspaper transactions in the United States over the past decade. Prior to joining the firm, Van Essen worked exclusively in the newspaper business, and was, at one point, general manager/business manager and part owner of a daily newspaper. On the basis of this background, the district court concluded that Van Essen was "plainly qualified to provide testimony regarding the fair value of Cox's shares." R16-251 at 15.

Van Essen's starting point in valuing Cox's shares was the fair market value of the News-Journal as a "going concern."4 To determine fair market value, Van Essen used a comparable sales analysis, which measures the market value of a newspaper primarily in relation to the purchase prices of comparable newspapers.5 Van Essen began his analysis by comparing NJC's Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization ("EBITDA") margin to the average EBITDA or operating margin of eleven publicly traded newspaper companies. In comparison to NJC's operating margin of 9.3%, the eleven publicly traded newspaper companies had an average operating margin of 28.3%. Relying on this data, Van Essen normalized NJC's operating margin to 28.3%. R27 at 396-97, 399.

From a database of over 1000 newspaper transactions, Van Essen selected seven transactions involving newspaper companies comparable to the News-Journal. Id. at 400; R7-141, Exh. 1 at 8. Van Essen selected the comparables based on 506 different measures, including growth, circulation, financial metrics, and market characteristics. He then calculated the average purchase price-to-revenue and purchase price-to-EBITDA ratios of the comparable companies. After excluding two due to abnormally high ratios, Van Essen determined that the remaining comparables had an average purchase price-to-revenue ratio of 4.1:1 and an average purchase price-to-EBITDA ratio of 14.4:1. R27 at 407.

In a slight departure from his standard approach, Van Essen then adjusted his multipliers downward in order to account for NJC's higher than average capital expenditures and a possible reduction in NJC's growth rate. Id. Thus, Van Essen determined that the News-Journal's fair market value as of 10 May 2004 was $270 million. Id. at 408. Under a similar analysis, Van Essen further determined that the fair market value of Pennysaver was $36 million. Id. at 412. Accordingly, Van Essen concluded that NJC's fair market value was $306 million and that Cox's 47.5% share of that total — and thus the relevant "fair value" — came to $145,350,000. Id. As a check on the market approach, Van Essen also conducted a discounted cash-flow analysis of NJC. Using a projected growth rate of 6%, as in his view was appropriate to NJC's circumstances, and a normalized operating margin of 28.3%, Van Essen concluded that NJC's fair value under the discounted cash-flow analysis was $289 million.7 R7-141, Exh. 1 at 17.

NJC's expert, Robert E. Duffy is a certified public accountant and partner in the firm of Grant Thornton. He is also accredited as a senior appraiser by the American Society of Appraisers. Unlike Van Essen, however, Duffy has had little experience in valuing newspapers. His specialty is in gift taxation and complex dissolutions of marriage. Complex dissolutions of marriage account for approximately 90% of Duffy's practice. Based on this background, the district court also found Duffy to be qualified as an expert, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • April 22, 2019
    ...nor the record provide sufficient explanation to enable meaningful appellate review" (emphasis added)); Cox Enters. v. News-Journal Corp., 510 F.3d 1350, 1361 (11th Cir. 2007) (finding no abuse of discretion in district court's decision not to award prejudgment interest based on the record)......
  • Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • October 3, 2018
    ...nor the record provide sufficient explanation to enable meaningful appellate review" (emphasis added) ); Cox Enters. v. News-Journal Corp., 510 F.3d 1350, 1361 (11th Cir. 2007) (finding no abuse of discretion in district court’s decision not to award prejudgment interest based on the record......
  • Sos v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • August 30, 2023
    ... ... rulings for abuse of discretion. In re Equifax Inc ... Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig. , 999 F.3d 1247, 1275 ... Cox Enters., Inc. v ... News-J. Corp. , 510 F.3d 1350, 1360 (11th Cir. 2007) ... Fifth, we review a ... ...
  • Puklich v. Puklich
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • June 27, 2019
    ...difference between the post-judgment interest and the dividends she has actually received"). See also Cox Enters., Inc. v. News-Journal Corp. , 510 F.3d 1350, 1361 (11th Cir. 2007) (denial of interest during two-and-a-half-year period from date of valuation to final judgment was proper wher......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Appendix E Judicial Decisions Cited in the Text
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Institute Developing the Evidence
    • Invalid date
    ...B.R. 621 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2006) • Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du Bois, 312 U.S. 510 (1941) • Cox Enterprises v. News-Journal Corp., 510 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 2007) • Crescent/Mach I Partnership L.P. v. Turner, No. Civ. A. 17455-VCN and 17711-VCN, 2007 WL 1342263 (Del. Ch. May 2, 2007) ......
  • Chapter 6 Factors in Determining Relevance and Reliability: Due Diligence Considerations
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Institute Developing the Evidence
    • Invalid date
    ...al. (2011), §§ 7.02 and 7.03.[195] Id. § 404.17.[196] Trugman (2017), p. 210-214.[197] See, e.g., Cox Enterprises v. News-Journal Corp., 510 F.3d 1350, 1358 (11th Cir. 2007) (finding no abuse of discretion where district court "adopted [expert's comparable sales] valuation method based upon......
  • A Path to More Sustainable Corporations in the United States
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics No. 34-4, October 2021
    • October 1, 2021
    ...can make choices that protect the company’s “culture” at the expense of immediate shareholder gains); Cox Enterprises Inc. v. Davidson, 510 F.3d 1350, 1353–54 (11th Cir. 2007) (aff‌irming holding that corporate boards must make choices that maximize short-term shareholder value, not to supp......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT